2005•Yiyao daobaoRequires access

Drug Sensitivity of Acute Refractory Leukemia Cells to Chemotherapeutic Agents

Huaiping Tian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the drug sensitivity of acute refractory leukemia cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents in vitro. Methods 37 bone marrow specimens from patients with acute refractory leukemia were collected from which leukemia cells were separated for the preparation of leukemic cell suspensions .The drug sensitivity of the leukemic cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents was assayed with the MTT methods and the rates of inhibition of these agents on the different leukemic cells were determined. Results Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) cells and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) cells were sensitive to etoposida (VP-16) and cylosine arabinoside(Ara-C) but not to daunorubicin(DNP),epirubicin(EPI),pirarubicin(THP),cisplatin(DDP) and mytomycin(MMC).The rate of inhibition of teniposide(VM-26) and etoposide(VP-16) on ALL cells was higher that on ANLL cells .In contrast ,the rate of inhibition of mitoxantrone(MIT) on ANLL cells was higher than that on ALL cells. Conclusion In general, acute refractory leukemia should be submitted to a chemotherapeutic plan containing VP-16 and Ara-c. ALL could better be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing VM-26 and VR-16 while ANLL should be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing MIT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the drug sensitivity of acute refractory leukemia cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents in vitro. Methods 37 bone marrow specimens from patients with acute refractory leukemia were collected from which leukemia cells were separated for the preparation of leukemic cell suspensions .The drug sensitivity of the leukemic cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents was assayed with the MTT methods and the rates of inhibition of these agents on the different leukemic cells were determined. Results Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) cells and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) cells were sensitive to etoposida (VP-16) and cylosine arabinoside(Ara-C) but not to daunorubicin(DNP),epirubicin(EPI),pirarubicin(THP),cisplatin(DDP) and mytomycin(MMC).The rate of inhibition of teniposide(VM-26) and etoposide(VP-16) on ALL cells was higher that on ANLL cells .In contrast ,the rate of inhibition of mitoxantrone(MIT) on ANLL cells was higher than that on ALL cells. Conclusion In general, acute refractory leukemia should be submitted to a chemotherapeutic plan containing VP-16 and Ara-c. ALL could better be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing VM-26 and VR-16 while ANLL should be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing MIT.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the drug sensitivity of acute refractory leukemia cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents in vitro. Methods 37 bone marrow specimens from patients with acute refractory leukemia were collected from which leukemia cells were separated for the preparation of leukemic cell suspensions .The drug sensitivity of the leukemic cells to 13 chemotherapeutic agents was assayed with the MTT methods and the rates of inhibition of these agents on the different leukemic cells were determined. Results Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) cells and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) cells were sensitive to etoposida (VP-16) and cylosine arabinoside(Ara-C) but not to daunorubicin(DNP),epirubicin(EPI),pirarubicin(THP),cisplatin(DDP) and mytomycin(MMC).The rate of inhibition of teniposide(VM-26) and etoposide(VP-16) on ALL cells was higher that on ANLL cells .In contrast ,the rate of inhibition of mitoxantrone(MIT) on ANLL cells was higher than that on ALL cells. Conclusion In general, acute refractory leukemia should be submitted to a chemotherapeutic plan containing VP-16 and Ara-c. ALL could better be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing VM-26 and VR-16 while ANLL should be treated with a chemotherapeutic plan containing MIT.

Key concepts: Teniposide, Leukemia, Daunorubicin, Mitoxantrone, Pirarubicin, Etoposide, Medicine, Acute leukemia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Drug Sensitivity of Acute Refractory Leukemia Cells to Chemotherapeutic Agents — Research Paper | ScholarLens