2004•Journal of law and medicineRequires access

Determine the extend of compensation association with medical dispute——call in question to the section 49 of the The rule of medical accidents settle

Ma Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are contradictions between “The rule of medical accidents settle” and the principle of civil law and the judicial practices, so that some difficulties was caused for the patience when they try to obtain the judicial remedies, while the judges face the very similar problems. This essay tries to disavowal the view “no medical accident no compensation” by explaining the concept of medical malpractice, citing the very lately judicial practices, comparing the relevant domestic laws as well as discusses the improper infection of the evaluation to the judgment. Besides, this essay brings forward three kind of viable measures: restrict the limits of authority of the medical academy evaluation; conclusion of accidental evaluation is only a kind of evidence; the judicial expertise; medical academy evaluation and judge himself can identify the tort facts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are contradictions between “The rule of medical accidents settle” and the principle of civil law and the judicial practices, so that some difficulties was caused for the patience when they try to obtain the judicial remedies, while the judges face the very similar problems. This essay tries to disavowal the view “no medical accident no compensation” by explaining the concept of medical malpractice, citing the very lately judicial practices, comparing the relevant domestic laws as well as discusses the improper infection of the evaluation to the judgment. Besides, this essay brings forward three kind of viable measures: restrict the limits of authority of the medical academy evaluation; conclusion of accidental evaluation is only a kind of evidence; the judicial expertise; medical academy evaluation and judge himself can identify the tort facts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are contradictions between “The rule of medical accidents settle” and the principle of civil law and the judicial practices, so that some difficulties was caused for the patience when they try to obtain the judicial remedies, while the judges face the very similar problems. This essay tries to disavowal the view “no medical accident no compensation” by explaining the concept of medical malpractice, citing the very lately judicial practices, comparing the relevant domestic laws as well as discusses the improper infection of the evaluation to the judgment. Besides, this essay brings forward three kind of viable measures: restrict the limits of authority of the medical academy evaluation; conclusion of accidental evaluation is only a kind of evidence; the judicial expertise; medical academy evaluation and judge himself can identify the tort facts.

Key concepts: Compensation (psychology), Tort, Accidental, Law, Patience, Face (sociological concept), Malpractice, Medical negligence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determine the extend of compensation association with medical dispute——call in question to the section 49 of the The rule of medical accidents settle — Research Paper | ScholarLens