2005•Shanghai Medical ImagingRequires access

Comparative analysis of ultrasonographic and appearances of typical and atypical breast medullary carcinoma

Xiufen Zhao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between the sonographic and histologic appearances of breast medullary carcinoma, and to determine the value of sonography in the differentiation of typical and atypical breast medullary carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed ultrasonographic appearances of 19 cases of breast medullary carcinoma which were confirmed by pathology. Results Eight of 19 medullary carcinomas were classified as typical and 11 were atypical. On sonography,a smooth outline was visualized in 6 of the 8 typical medullary carcinomas but in none of 11 atypical carcinomas. A jagged margin was sonographically visualized in 10 of 11 atypical carcinomas, and a focal irregularity in the margin was visualized in 1 of the 11 atypical carcinomas. Four of the typical medullary carcinomas had posterior enhancement, and 8 of the atypical medullary carcinomas showed retrotumoral shadowing. The difference of tumor margin regularity between typical and atypical medullary carcinomas was statistically significant. Conclusions Treatment and prognosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas are different. Ultrasonography is useful in the differential diagnosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the relationship between the sonographic and histologic appearances of breast medullary carcinoma, and to determine the value of sonography in the differentiation of typical and atypical breast medullary carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed ultrasonographic appearances of 19 cases of breast medullary carcinoma which were confirmed by pathology. Results Eight of 19 medullary carcinomas were classified as typical and 11 were atypical. On sonography,a smooth outline was visualized in 6 of the 8 typical medullary carcinomas but in none of 11 atypical carcinomas. A jagged margin was sonographically visualized in 10 of 11 atypical carcinomas, and a focal irregularity in the margin was visualized in 1 of the 11 atypical carcinomas. Four of the typical medullary carcinomas had posterior enhancement, and 8 of the atypical medullary carcinomas showed retrotumoral shadowing. The difference of tumor margin regularity between typical and atypical medullary carcinomas was statistically significant. Conclusions Treatment and prognosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas are different. Ultrasonography is useful in the differential diagnosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between the sonographic and histologic appearances of breast medullary carcinoma, and to determine the value of sonography in the differentiation of typical and atypical breast medullary carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed ultrasonographic appearances of 19 cases of breast medullary carcinoma which were confirmed by pathology. Results Eight of 19 medullary carcinomas were classified as typical and 11 were atypical. On sonography,a smooth outline was visualized in 6 of the 8 typical medullary carcinomas but in none of 11 atypical carcinomas. A jagged margin was sonographically visualized in 10 of 11 atypical carcinomas, and a focal irregularity in the margin was visualized in 1 of the 11 atypical carcinomas. Four of the typical medullary carcinomas had posterior enhancement, and 8 of the atypical medullary carcinomas showed retrotumoral shadowing. The difference of tumor margin regularity between typical and atypical medullary carcinomas was statistically significant. Conclusions Treatment and prognosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas are different. Ultrasonography is useful in the differential diagnosis of typical and atypical medullary carcinomas.

Key concepts: Medullary cavity, Medullary carcinoma, Medicine, Pathology, Differential diagnosis, Carcinoma, Thyroid carcinoma, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of ultrasonographic and appearances of typical and atypical breast medullary carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens