Effects of right ventricular outflow septal pacing on cardiac functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block
Shao Sha
Abstract
Shao Sha
Abstract
AIM;To compare the effect of right ventricular outflow tract septum(RVS) pacing and right ventricular apical(RVA) pacing on contraction synchrony,ventricular remodeling and cardiac functions.METHODS:Sixty-one patients(39 males,22 females) with III atrium ventricular conduction block(AVB) were randomly divided into RVS group(n=33) and RVA group(n=28).The parameters of the pacing leads on implantation and post-implantation and changes of QRS duration of pre- and post-implantation were observed.The ventricular synchrony was evaluated by tissue Doppler and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) were compared between groups.RESULTS;No statistical differences were observed in the pacing parameters between groups(P 0.05).Post-implantation QRS duration was significantly prolonged in both groups(P 0.01),especially in the RVA group(P 0.01).Ts(time to peak systolic velocity) of the left lateral wall to the right wall was(27 ± 14) ms for RVS pacing and(90 ± 22) ms for RVA pacing(P 0.01).LVEDD of post-implantation significantly increased compared with pre-implantation in RVA group[(54 ± 5) mm vs.(50 ±4) mm,P0.05].LVEF statistically decreased in both groups[RVS:(0.58 ±0.14) ts.(0.63 ±0.09),P0.01;RVA:(0.51 ±0.12) vs.(0.64 ±0.13),P 0.01].CONCLUSION:RVS pacing achieves a better effect on cardiac contraction synchrony and ventricular remodeling than RVA pacing.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM;To compare the effect of right ventricular outflow tract septum(RVS) pacing and right ventricular apical(RVA) pacing on contraction synchrony,ventricular remodeling and cardiac functions.METHODS:Sixty-one patients(39 males,22 females) with III atrium ventricular conduction block(AVB) were randomly divided into RVS group(n=33) and RVA group(n=28).The parameters of the pacing leads on implantation and post-implantation and changes of QRS duration of pre- and post-implantation were observed.The ventricular synchrony was evaluated by tissue Doppler and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) were compared between groups.RESULTS;No statistical differences were observed in the pacing parameters between groups(P 0.05).Post-implantation QRS duration was significantly prolonged in both groups(P 0.01),especially in the RVA group(P 0.01).Ts(time to peak systolic velocity) of the left lateral wall to the right wall was(27 ± 14) ms for RVS pacing and(90 ± 22) ms for RVA pacing(P 0.01).LVEDD of post-implantation significantly increased compared with pre-implantation in RVA group[(54 ± 5) mm vs.(50 ±4) mm,P0.05].LVEF statistically decreased in both groups[RVS:(0.58 ±0.14) ts.(0.63 ±0.09),P0.01;RVA:(0.51 ±0.12) vs.(0.64 ±0.13),P 0.01].CONCLUSION:RVS pacing achieves a better effect on cardiac contraction synchrony and ventricular remodeling than RVA pacing.
Key concepts: Cardiology, QRS complex, Medicine, Internal medicine, Ejection fraction, Atrioventricular block, Ventricular pacing, Tissue Doppler echocardiography