2008Liaoning tiyu ke-jiRequires access

A comparative study on offence and defense techniques and strategy of China and Brazil in the 5~(th) FIFA Women World Cup

Gong Zhi-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Through comparative studying the offence and defense techniques and strategy of China and Brazil,we analyzed the dominance and characteristics of Brazil Women's team,and the difference between the two teams,in order to provide some references for China Women football team to prepare the Olympic Games and World Cup.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Through comparative studying the offence and defense techniques and strategy of China and Brazil,we analyzed the dominance and characteristics of Brazil Women's team,and the difference between the two teams,in order to provide some references for China Women football team to prepare the Olympic Games and World Cup.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Through comparative studying the offence and defense techniques and strategy of China and Brazil,we analyzed the dominance and characteristics of Brazil Women's team,and the difference between the two teams,in order to provide some references for China Women football team to prepare the Olympic Games and World Cup.

Key concepts: China, Dominance (genetics), Football, Order (exchange), Political science, Advertising, Business, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study on offence and defense techniques and strategy of China and Brazil in the 5~(th) FIFA Women World Cup — Research Paper | ScholarLens