2013•China Modern MedicineRequires access

Clinical application of laryngeal mask airway in combination with propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in anorectal operation

Guoxiang Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical application of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in spontaneously breathing: propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in anorectal operation. Methods Fifty-seven cases of patients with anorectal operation, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ, propofol and remifentanil intravenous anesthesia in induced after insertion of standard laryngeal mask. anesthesia was maintained with Micro pump infusion of propofol 4-6 mg/(kg·h), remifentanil 0.1-0.2 μg/(kg·min). Patients breathed spontaneously during the operation, the change of life signs and adverse events was record. Results All cases were successful insertion of a LMA. No obvious changes could be found with HR, MAP that LMA insertion after 1 min, 1 min after operation, pull out the LMA after 1min, haemodynamic parameters keep stable after LMA. 23% cases of SpO295%, 14% cases of HR60/min. Without intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion With propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing has the advantages as follows: haemodynamic is stable. Postoperative anesthesia recovery fast, less complications, but the need to pay attention to effect of remifentanil on heart, lung function inhibition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the clinical application of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in spontaneously breathing: propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in anorectal operation. Methods Fifty-seven cases of patients with anorectal operation, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ, propofol and remifentanil intravenous anesthesia in induced after insertion of standard laryngeal mask. anesthesia was maintained with Micro pump infusion of propofol 4-6 mg/(kg·h), remifentanil 0.1-0.2 μg/(kg·min). Patients breathed spontaneously during the operation, the change of life signs and adverse events was record. Results All cases were successful insertion of a LMA. No obvious changes could be found with HR, MAP that LMA insertion after 1 min, 1 min after operation, pull out the LMA after 1min, haemodynamic parameters keep stable after LMA. 23% cases of SpO295%, 14% cases of HR60/min. Without intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion With propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing has the advantages as follows: haemodynamic is stable. Postoperative anesthesia recovery fast, less complications, but the need to pay attention to effect of remifentanil on heart, lung function inhibition.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the clinical application of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in spontaneously breathing: propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in anorectal operation. Methods Fifty-seven cases of patients with anorectal operation, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ, propofol and remifentanil intravenous anesthesia in induced after insertion of standard laryngeal mask. anesthesia was maintained with Micro pump infusion of propofol 4-6 mg/(kg·h), remifentanil 0.1-0.2 μg/(kg·min). Patients breathed spontaneously during the operation, the change of life signs and adverse events was record. Results All cases were successful insertion of a LMA. No obvious changes could be found with HR, MAP that LMA insertion after 1 min, 1 min after operation, pull out the LMA after 1min, haemodynamic parameters keep stable after LMA. 23% cases of SpO295%, 14% cases of HR60/min. Without intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion With propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing has the advantages as follows: haemodynamic is stable. Postoperative anesthesia recovery fast, less complications, but the need to pay attention to effect of remifentanil on heart, lung function inhibition.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Medicine, Propofol, Anesthesia, Laryngeal mask airway, Hemodynamics, Airway, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical application of laryngeal mask airway in combination with propofol and remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia in anorectal operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens