2003Zhongguo Renmin Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Problem of "Nature and Heavenly Tao" and the Distinction of Schools of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties

Xiang Dong Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Problem of and Heavenly Tao is abandoned by Confucians from Han to Tang Dynasties though it is a basic source of thought to Chinese philosophy of ontology. The philosophers of Wei and Jin Dynasties broke through the dull arguments between heaven and man according to their new views. The Confucian revival after Tang Dynasty was essentially the restoration of nature, from which the NeoConfucians created the distinct theoretical systems of NeoConfucianism and the categories of noumena on the basis of their conscious cognition of and Heavenly Tao. Hu Hong interpreted the full development of as the completion of in term of his sumup of the different viewpoints of nature and schools in the North Song Dynasty. He founded the School of Nature which distinguished from schools of material force, heavenly principle or mind. Thus, NeoConfucianism as a whole was formally founded.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Problem of and Heavenly Tao is abandoned by Confucians from Han to Tang Dynasties though it is a basic source of thought to Chinese philosophy of ontology. The philosophers of Wei and Jin Dynasties broke through the dull arguments between heaven and man according to their new views. The Confucian revival after Tang Dynasty was essentially the restoration of nature, from which the NeoConfucians created the distinct theoretical systems of NeoConfucianism and the categories of noumena on the basis of their conscious cognition of and Heavenly Tao. Hu Hong interpreted the full development of as the completion of in term of his sumup of the different viewpoints of nature and schools in the North Song Dynasty. He founded the School of Nature which distinguished from schools of material force, heavenly principle or mind. Thus, NeoConfucianism as a whole was formally founded.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Problem of and Heavenly Tao is abandoned by Confucians from Han to Tang Dynasties though it is a basic source of thought to Chinese philosophy of ontology. The philosophers of Wei and Jin Dynasties broke through the dull arguments between heaven and man according to their new views. The Confucian revival after Tang Dynasty was essentially the restoration of nature, from which the NeoConfucians created the distinct theoretical systems of NeoConfucianism and the categories of noumena on the basis of their conscious cognition of and Heavenly Tao. Hu Hong interpreted the full development of as the completion of in term of his sumup of the different viewpoints of nature and schools in the North Song Dynasty. He founded the School of Nature which distinguished from schools of material force, heavenly principle or mind. Thus, NeoConfucianism as a whole was formally founded.

Key concepts: Heaven, Viewpoints, Neo-Confucianism, Chinese philosophy, Philosophy, Ontology, Six Dynasties, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Problem of "Nature and Heavenly Tao" and the Distinction of Schools of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties — Research Paper | ScholarLens