Diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis
Ni Lin
Abstract
Ni Lin
Abstract
Objective To assess the diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis.Methods The routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination of 23 cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 14 patients with definitive meningeal carcinomatosis were analyzed,retrospectively.Results The positive rate of routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination were 39.13%(9/23)and 86.96%(20/23),respectively. There was a significant difference between two results ( P0.01). The two positive rates were 28.57% (4/14) and 78.57%(11/14)in the first cerebrospinal fluid specimens,there was also a significant difference between the results ( P0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity of EMA immunocytochemistry examination is superior to routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To assess the diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis.Methods The routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination of 23 cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 14 patients with definitive meningeal carcinomatosis were analyzed,retrospectively.Results The positive rate of routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination were 39.13%(9/23)and 86.96%(20/23),respectively. There was a significant difference between two results ( P0.01). The two positive rates were 28.57% (4/14) and 78.57%(11/14)in the first cerebrospinal fluid specimens,there was also a significant difference between the results ( P0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity of EMA immunocytochemistry examination is superior to routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.
Key concepts: Immunocytochemistry, Cerebrospinal fluid, Meningeal carcinomatosis, Pathology, Medicine, Cytology, Physical examination, Significant difference