2005Journal of Clinical NeurologyRequires access

Diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis

Ni Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis.Methods The routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination of 23 cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 14 patients with definitive meningeal carcinomatosis were analyzed,retrospectively.Results The positive rate of routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination were 39.13%(9/23)and 86.96%(20/23),respectively. There was a significant difference between two results ( P0.01). The two positive rates were 28.57% (4/14) and 78.57%(11/14)in the first cerebrospinal fluid specimens,there was also a significant difference between the results ( P0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity of EMA immunocytochemistry examination is superior to routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis.Methods The routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination of 23 cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 14 patients with definitive meningeal carcinomatosis were analyzed,retrospectively.Results The positive rate of routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination were 39.13%(9/23)and 86.96%(20/23),respectively. There was a significant difference between two results ( P0.01). The two positive rates were 28.57% (4/14) and 78.57%(11/14)in the first cerebrospinal fluid specimens,there was also a significant difference between the results ( P0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity of EMA immunocytochemistry examination is superior to routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis.Methods The routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination of 23 cerebrospinal fluid specimens from 14 patients with definitive meningeal carcinomatosis were analyzed,retrospectively.Results The positive rate of routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination and EMA immunocytochemistry examination were 39.13%(9/23)and 86.96%(20/23),respectively. There was a significant difference between two results ( P0.01). The two positive rates were 28.57% (4/14) and 78.57%(11/14)in the first cerebrospinal fluid specimens,there was also a significant difference between the results ( P0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity of EMA immunocytochemistry examination is superior to routine cerebrospinal fluid cytologic examination in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis.

Key concepts: Immunocytochemistry, Cerebrospinal fluid, Meningeal carcinomatosis, Pathology, Medicine, Cytology, Physical examination, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis value of epithelial membrane antigen immunocytochemistry examination in meningeal carcinomatosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens