2005•Journal of Shanxi Teachers UniversityRequires access

Misreading in Literary Translation

Jiying Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Traditional meaning theories propose that a text meaning is determined by the author's intention or by the text itself.Correct of the source text is to reproduce the author's intention or the text meaning.However,it is proved to be an ideal by recent researching findings of modern meaning theories.The paper argues that the popularity of misreading is determined by the undecidability,richness and openness of literary meaning.It indicates that a translator's understanding of the source text is incomplete,historical,subjective and creative.Translator's creative understanding and interpretation does not only enrich the meaning of a source text,but also improve communication across cultures.It is suggested that critics adopt a more tolerated attitude towards misreading in literary translation because it provides possibility for the re-creation of source text meaning and re-construction of target culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional meaning theories propose that a text meaning is determined by the author's intention or by the text itself.Correct of the source text is to reproduce the author's intention or the text meaning.However,it is proved to be an ideal by recent researching findings of modern meaning theories.The paper argues that the popularity of misreading is determined by the undecidability,richness and openness of literary meaning.It indicates that a translator's understanding of the source text is incomplete,historical,subjective and creative.Translator's creative understanding and interpretation does not only enrich the meaning of a source text,but also improve communication across cultures.It is suggested that critics adopt a more tolerated attitude towards misreading in literary translation because it provides possibility for the re-creation of source text meaning and re-construction of target culture.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional meaning theories propose that a text meaning is determined by the author's intention or by the text itself.Correct of the source text is to reproduce the author's intention or the text meaning.However,it is proved to be an ideal by recent researching findings of modern meaning theories.The paper argues that the popularity of misreading is determined by the undecidability,richness and openness of literary meaning.It indicates that a translator's understanding of the source text is incomplete,historical,subjective and creative.Translator's creative understanding and interpretation does not only enrich the meaning of a source text,but also improve communication across cultures.It is suggested that critics adopt a more tolerated attitude towards misreading in literary translation because it provides possibility for the re-creation of source text meaning and re-construction of target culture.

Key concepts: Meaning (existential), Popularity, Source text, Interpretation (philosophy), Openness to experience, Linguistics, Ideal (ethics), Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Misreading in Literary Translation — Research Paper | ScholarLens