2005Jianzhu jiegou xuebaoRequires access

Quantitative evaluation of two shear transfer mechanisms in earthquake resistant beam-column joints

Bai Shao-liang

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

It is a very important unresolved problem of how to figure out the contributions of two kinds of shear transfer mechanisms respectively, i.e. the strut mechanism and the truss mechanism, in RC beam column joints subjected to different levels of shear reversals. The main obstacle is to find out a rational method which can not only represent the behavior of joints but also have clear physical background. In this paper, a so called ‘simply supported beam column model’was proposed based on the serial test results. If the forces in the reinforcement and compressed concrete in beams and columns surrounding a joint were known, the contributions of such two mechanisms in shear transfer in the joint core could be determined respectively by using this model, while the upper and lower reinforcement in the beams may be symmetric or asymmetric. The predicted results have shown good agreement with the test results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is a very important unresolved problem of how to figure out the contributions of two kinds of shear transfer mechanisms respectively, i.e. the strut mechanism and the truss mechanism, in RC beam column joints subjected to different levels of shear reversals. The main obstacle is to find out a rational method which can not only represent the behavior of joints but also have clear physical background. In this paper, a so called ‘simply supported beam column model’was proposed based on the serial test results. If the forces in the reinforcement and compressed concrete in beams and columns surrounding a joint were known, the contributions of such two mechanisms in shear transfer in the joint core could be determined respectively by using this model, while the upper and lower reinforcement in the beams may be symmetric or asymmetric. The predicted results have shown good agreement with the test results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is a very important unresolved problem of how to figure out the contributions of two kinds of shear transfer mechanisms respectively, i.e. the strut mechanism and the truss mechanism, in RC beam column joints subjected to different levels of shear reversals. The main obstacle is to find out a rational method which can not only represent the behavior of joints but also have clear physical background. In this paper, a so called ‘simply supported beam column model’was proposed based on the serial test results. If the forces in the reinforcement and compressed concrete in beams and columns surrounding a joint were known, the contributions of such two mechanisms in shear transfer in the joint core could be determined respectively by using this model, while the upper and lower reinforcement in the beams may be symmetric or asymmetric. The predicted results have shown good agreement with the test results.

Key concepts: Truss, Structural engineering, Shear (geology), Joint (building), Beam (structure), Reinforcement, Shear force, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative evaluation of two shear transfer mechanisms in earthquake resistant beam-column joints — Research Paper | ScholarLens