Clinical observation of IMOP regimen in therapeutic effect on non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma
Jun Jiang
Abstract
Jun Jiang
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of IMOP regimen to treat non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Methods: From march 1996 to march 1999, 81 cases with histologically and immunohistochemically proven non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups: GroupⅠ, 41 cases were treated by IMOP regimen, it consisted of IFO 1.2 g/m2(i.v.drop.day1~5), MIT 10 mg/m2(i.v.day1), VCR1.4 mg/m2 (i.v.day1), Pred 40 mg/m2 (po.day1~5); Group Ⅱ, 40 cases were treated by CHOP regimen. it consisted of 750 mg/m2 (iv.drop.day1), ADM 40 mg/m2 (iv.day1), VCR 1.4 mg/m2 (iv.day1, 8), Pred 40 mg/m2(po.day1~5), Both groups were repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Patients in both group were well matched with baseline disease characteristics(P0.05). 81 cases with non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma entered into this study, 41 patients received IMOP regimen, the complete remission rate was 70%(29/41), the overall response rate was 87.8%(36/41)and the 5 year survived rate was 58.82%, 40 patients received CHOP regimen, the complete remission rate was 52.5%(21/40), the overall response rate was 65% (26/40) and the 5 year survive rate was 28.77%, There was a significant difference in the complete remission rate between the two groups (P0.05). The toxicity were myelosuppression, but there wasn′t a significant difference (P0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that IMOP regimen may be more effective than CHOP regimen. So this regimen can be considered as a effective regimen for non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of IMOP regimen to treat non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Methods: From march 1996 to march 1999, 81 cases with histologically and immunohistochemically proven non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into two groups: GroupⅠ, 41 cases were treated by IMOP regimen, it consisted of IFO 1.2 g/m2(i.v.drop.day1~5), MIT 10 mg/m2(i.v.day1), VCR1.4 mg/m2 (i.v.day1), Pred 40 mg/m2 (po.day1~5); Group Ⅱ, 40 cases were treated by CHOP regimen. it consisted of 750 mg/m2 (iv.drop.day1), ADM 40 mg/m2 (iv.day1), VCR 1.4 mg/m2 (iv.day1, 8), Pred 40 mg/m2(po.day1~5), Both groups were repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Patients in both group were well matched with baseline disease characteristics(P0.05). 81 cases with non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma entered into this study, 41 patients received IMOP regimen, the complete remission rate was 70%(29/41), the overall response rate was 87.8%(36/41)and the 5 year survived rate was 58.82%, 40 patients received CHOP regimen, the complete remission rate was 52.5%(21/40), the overall response rate was 65% (26/40) and the 5 year survive rate was 28.77%, There was a significant difference in the complete remission rate between the two groups (P0.05). The toxicity were myelosuppression, but there wasn′t a significant difference (P0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that IMOP regimen may be more effective than CHOP regimen. So this regimen can be considered as a effective regimen for non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma.
Key concepts: Medicine, Regimen, Internal medicine, Lymphoma, Gastroenterology, CHOP, Toxicity, Surgery