2013Shanghai yixueRequires access

Pharmacodynamic investigation of rifampicin , linezolid and glycopeptide antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Yin Qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the selective power of anti-drug-resistant mutant of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampicin to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) .Methods The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to MRSA was determined by E-test method. Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) was measured by mix-bacterial method (the inoculated bacterial concentration1×1010CFU/mL) .Selection index (MPC/MIC) and the ratio of MPC to target maximum serum concentration (MPC/Cmax) of the four antibiotics were compared.Results MIC values of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampin against MRSA were 0.5,1.0,0.5and≤0.5μg/mL; MPC values were 51.2, 25.6 , 9.6and 1024.0 μg/mL ; Selection indices were 102.4 , 25.6 , 19.2and2 048.0; MPC/Cmax were 1.28 , 0.57 , 0.64 and107.80 , respectively.Conclusion Linezolid and teicoplanin have narrower mutant selection window than vancomycin and rifampin , and they have obvious advantages in preventing bacterial antibiotic resistance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the selective power of anti-drug-resistant mutant of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampicin to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) .Methods The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to MRSA was determined by E-test method. Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) was measured by mix-bacterial method (the inoculated bacterial concentration1×1010CFU/mL) .Selection index (MPC/MIC) and the ratio of MPC to target maximum serum concentration (MPC/Cmax) of the four antibiotics were compared.Results MIC values of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampin against MRSA were 0.5,1.0,0.5and≤0.5μg/mL; MPC values were 51.2, 25.6 , 9.6and 1024.0 μg/mL ; Selection indices were 102.4 , 25.6 , 19.2and2 048.0; MPC/Cmax were 1.28 , 0.57 , 0.64 and107.80 , respectively.Conclusion Linezolid and teicoplanin have narrower mutant selection window than vancomycin and rifampin , and they have obvious advantages in preventing bacterial antibiotic resistance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the selective power of anti-drug-resistant mutant of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampicin to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) .Methods The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to MRSA was determined by E-test method. Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) was measured by mix-bacterial method (the inoculated bacterial concentration1×1010CFU/mL) .Selection index (MPC/MIC) and the ratio of MPC to target maximum serum concentration (MPC/Cmax) of the four antibiotics were compared.Results MIC values of vancomycin , teicoplanin , linezolid and rifampin against MRSA were 0.5,1.0,0.5and≤0.5μg/mL; MPC values were 51.2, 25.6 , 9.6and 1024.0 μg/mL ; Selection indices were 102.4 , 25.6 , 19.2and2 048.0; MPC/Cmax were 1.28 , 0.57 , 0.64 and107.80 , respectively.Conclusion Linezolid and teicoplanin have narrower mutant selection window than vancomycin and rifampin , and they have obvious advantages in preventing bacterial antibiotic resistance.

Key concepts: Teicoplanin, Linezolid, Vancomycin, Antibiotics, Microbiology, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Glycopeptide, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pharmacodynamic investigation of rifampicin , linezolid and glycopeptide antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — Research Paper | ScholarLens