2006Journal of Evidence-Based MedicineRequires access

A Systematic Review of the Practicability of Immediate Removal of Mandibular Third Molar in the Presence of Pericoronitis Comparing with Traditional Treatment

GU Xiao-ming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Comparing with traditional treatment, the complications and side effects were evaluated after the extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis. Methods According to the principle of systematic review and meta-analysis, 10 papers about the practicability of extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis were analysed. Results Comparing with traditional treatment of pericoronitis, RR and CI of immediate extraction after operation were 0.24 and 0.12~0.50 relating to pain respectively. Immediate extraction was good for releasing swelling and trismus. Two treatments were different at the healing time. Conclusion Comparing with traditional treatment, immediate extraction of wisdom in the presence of pericoronitis leads to less pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Comparing with traditional treatment, the complications and side effects were evaluated after the extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis. Methods According to the principle of systematic review and meta-analysis, 10 papers about the practicability of extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis were analysed. Results Comparing with traditional treatment of pericoronitis, RR and CI of immediate extraction after operation were 0.24 and 0.12~0.50 relating to pain respectively. Immediate extraction was good for releasing swelling and trismus. Two treatments were different at the healing time. Conclusion Comparing with traditional treatment, immediate extraction of wisdom in the presence of pericoronitis leads to less pain.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Comparing with traditional treatment, the complications and side effects were evaluated after the extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis. Methods According to the principle of systematic review and meta-analysis, 10 papers about the practicability of extraction of the mandibular third molar in the presence of pericoronitis were analysed. Results Comparing with traditional treatment of pericoronitis, RR and CI of immediate extraction after operation were 0.24 and 0.12~0.50 relating to pain respectively. Immediate extraction was good for releasing swelling and trismus. Two treatments were different at the healing time. Conclusion Comparing with traditional treatment, immediate extraction of wisdom in the presence of pericoronitis leads to less pain.

Key concepts: Pericoronitis, Trismus, Wisdom tooth, Molar, Mandibular third molar, Medicine, Dentistry, Extraction (chemistry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Systematic Review of the Practicability of Immediate Removal of Mandibular Third Molar in the Presence of Pericoronitis Comparing with Traditional Treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens