2009Chinese Journal of OtologyRequires access

An endoscopic anatomy study of the cerebellopontine angle through retrolabyrinthine approach

Jia Fu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study anatomic land marksers and orientation methodology in the cerebellopontine angle through retrolabyrinthine approach under an endoscope. Methods In 10 cadaveric specimens (20 sides),endoscopic surgery via retrolabyrinthine approach was simulated. The anatomic features of the cerebellopontine angle were examined and measured. Results Measuring from the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal on plane of lateral semicircular canal,the distance was 15.89 ± 1.61 mm to the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus,27.43 ± 3.25 mm to the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve and 19.39 ± 2.57 mm to the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve,was 16.78 ± 2.06°. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve was 16.25 ± 2.88°. Conclusion Endoscopic surgery in the cerebellopontine angle via a retrolabyrinthine approach has advantages of minimal invasiveness,satisfactory exposure and multi -angle visualization and provides an efficient utility in microsurgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study anatomic land marksers and orientation methodology in the cerebellopontine angle through retrolabyrinthine approach under an endoscope. Methods In 10 cadaveric specimens (20 sides),endoscopic surgery via retrolabyrinthine approach was simulated. The anatomic features of the cerebellopontine angle were examined and measured. Results Measuring from the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal on plane of lateral semicircular canal,the distance was 15.89 ± 1.61 mm to the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus,27.43 ± 3.25 mm to the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve and 19.39 ± 2.57 mm to the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve,was 16.78 ± 2.06°. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve was 16.25 ± 2.88°. Conclusion Endoscopic surgery in the cerebellopontine angle via a retrolabyrinthine approach has advantages of minimal invasiveness,satisfactory exposure and multi -angle visualization and provides an efficient utility in microsurgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study anatomic land marksers and orientation methodology in the cerebellopontine angle through retrolabyrinthine approach under an endoscope. Methods In 10 cadaveric specimens (20 sides),endoscopic surgery via retrolabyrinthine approach was simulated. The anatomic features of the cerebellopontine angle were examined and measured. Results Measuring from the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal on plane of lateral semicircular canal,the distance was 15.89 ± 1.61 mm to the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus,27.43 ± 3.25 mm to the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve and 19.39 ± 2.57 mm to the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the upper margin of glossopharyngeal nerve,was 16.78 ± 2.06°. The angle between the line connecting the posterior margin of posterior semicircular canal with the posterior margin of internal acoustic meatus and the line connecting the inferior margin of trigeminal nerve was 16.25 ± 2.88°. Conclusion Endoscopic surgery in the cerebellopontine angle via a retrolabyrinthine approach has advantages of minimal invasiveness,satisfactory exposure and multi -angle visualization and provides an efficient utility in microsurgery.

Key concepts: Cerebellopontine angle, Posterior Semicircular Canal, Meatus, Anatomy, Medicine, Margin (machine learning), Cadaveric spasm, Internal auditory meatus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An endoscopic anatomy study of the cerebellopontine angle through retrolabyrinthine approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens