On the Border of Judicial Activism
Hu Jun
Abstract
Hu Jun
Abstract
When the judicial method of traditional-syllogism goes to the judicial negativism,its destruction to the law is obvious.Thus the judicial activism will inevitably be used,but the judicial activism which is directed by the essential legal system could collapse the basic purposes of the law.Therefore,the judicial activism should have a border: the judicial method of traditional-syllogism should be the first choice.At the same time,because legal principles embodied the basic values in the modern society,they should be used as the border of the judicial activism.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When the judicial method of traditional-syllogism goes to the judicial negativism,its destruction to the law is obvious.Thus the judicial activism will inevitably be used,but the judicial activism which is directed by the essential legal system could collapse the basic purposes of the law.Therefore,the judicial activism should have a border: the judicial method of traditional-syllogism should be the first choice.At the same time,because legal principles embodied the basic values in the modern society,they should be used as the border of the judicial activism.
Key concepts: Judicial activism, Political science, Law, Judicial review, Judicial opinion, Syllogism, Law and economics, Sociology