2005Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica ResearchRequires access

The in Vitro Antibiotical Effect of the Single Chinese Herbal Decoction and the Single Herbal Concentrate-granules against Clinical Bacterial Strains

Xiuhua Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the in vitro antibiotical effect of Chinese herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against clinical Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach.Methods:The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against MSSA and MRSA was detected and compared by M-H agar dilution method,with MIC50 and MIC90 determined.Results:Eight traditional Chinese medicines showed different antibacterial activities ,with Galla Chinensis being the most potent.The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction was better than that of single herbal concentrate-granules for Chinese traditional medicines except Galla Chinensis and Fructus Forsythiae.Conclusion:Difference of antibiotical effect between single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules maybe related to preparation technologies and qualities of raw medicinal materias.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the in vitro antibiotical effect of Chinese herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against clinical Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach.Methods:The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against MSSA and MRSA was detected and compared by M-H agar dilution method,with MIC50 and MIC90 determined.Results:Eight traditional Chinese medicines showed different antibacterial activities ,with Galla Chinensis being the most potent.The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction was better than that of single herbal concentrate-granules for Chinese traditional medicines except Galla Chinensis and Fructus Forsythiae.Conclusion:Difference of antibiotical effect between single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules maybe related to preparation technologies and qualities of raw medicinal materias.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the in vitro antibiotical effect of Chinese herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against clinical Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach.Methods:The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules for 8 traditional Chinese medicines against MSSA and MRSA was detected and compared by M-H agar dilution method,with MIC50 and MIC90 determined.Results:Eight traditional Chinese medicines showed different antibacterial activities ,with Galla Chinensis being the most potent.The antibiotical effect of single herbal decoction was better than that of single herbal concentrate-granules for Chinese traditional medicines except Galla Chinensis and Fructus Forsythiae.Conclusion:Difference of antibiotical effect between single herbal decoction and single herbal concentrate-granules maybe related to preparation technologies and qualities of raw medicinal materias.

Key concepts: Decoction, Traditional medicine, Agar Dilution Method, Medicine, Herbal tea, Antimicrobial, Chemistry, Minimum inhibitory concentration

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The in Vitro Antibiotical Effect of the Single Chinese Herbal Decoction and the Single Herbal Concentrate-granules against Clinical Bacterial Strains — Research Paper | ScholarLens