Comparison of hand-washing effects of three kinds of hand-washing products
Zhu B
Abstract
Zhu B
Abstract
Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.
Key concepts: Hand sanitizer, Medicine, Hand washing, SOAP, Toxicology, Hygiene, Computer science, Pathology