2014•China Medicine and PharmacyRequires access

Comparison of hand-washing effects of three kinds of hand-washing products

Zhu B

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm2, 8.3cfu/cm2 and 3.6cfu/cm2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.

Key concepts: Hand sanitizer, Medicine, Hand washing, SOAP, Toxicology, Hygiene, Computer science, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of hand-washing effects of three kinds of hand-washing products — Research Paper | ScholarLens