2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Feasibility study of continuous spinal anesthesia for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients with hypobaric ropivacaine and evobupivacaine

WU Zi-lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.Methods Sixty elderly patients(ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ) scheduled for lower limb joint replacement with continuous spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into group R and group L equally. Patients in group R received 0.3 hypobaric ropivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia and patients in group B received 0.3 hypobaric levobupivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia. Onset time of sensory block, upper sensory level, time to maximal degree of motor block, duration of analgesia and regression of Bromage 0 were investigated.Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation,consumption of local anesthetics and side effects were recorded.Results Onset of sensory block and motor block were slower in group R than those in group L(P0.01);Upper sensory level at the side of surgery in the two groups was higher than another side (P0.001);Duration of analgesia and motor recovery were shorter in group R than those in group L(P0.01);The ratio of Bromage 2 and Bromage 3 was lower in group R than that in group L(P0.05);Consumption of local anesthetics was more in group R than group L(P0.01).There were no significant hemodynamic changes in the two groups compared with baseline values (P0.05);The incidenxes of side effects during and after operation were low and there were no significant differences between the two groups. (P0.05).Conclusion Continuous spinal anesthesia with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine is safe and effective for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.Methods Sixty elderly patients(ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ) scheduled for lower limb joint replacement with continuous spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into group R and group L equally. Patients in group R received 0.3 hypobaric ropivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia and patients in group B received 0.3 hypobaric levobupivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia. Onset time of sensory block, upper sensory level, time to maximal degree of motor block, duration of analgesia and regression of Bromage 0 were investigated.Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation,consumption of local anesthetics and side effects were recorded.Results Onset of sensory block and motor block were slower in group R than those in group L(P0.01);Upper sensory level at the side of surgery in the two groups was higher than another side (P0.001);Duration of analgesia and motor recovery were shorter in group R than those in group L(P0.01);The ratio of Bromage 2 and Bromage 3 was lower in group R than that in group L(P0.05);Consumption of local anesthetics was more in group R than group L(P0.01).There were no significant hemodynamic changes in the two groups compared with baseline values (P0.05);The incidenxes of side effects during and after operation were low and there were no significant differences between the two groups. (P0.05).Conclusion Continuous spinal anesthesia with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine is safe and effective for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.Methods Sixty elderly patients(ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ) scheduled for lower limb joint replacement with continuous spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into group R and group L equally. Patients in group R received 0.3 hypobaric ropivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia and patients in group B received 0.3 hypobaric levobupivacaine 4 ml by spinal anesthesia. Onset time of sensory block, upper sensory level, time to maximal degree of motor block, duration of analgesia and regression of Bromage 0 were investigated.Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation,consumption of local anesthetics and side effects were recorded.Results Onset of sensory block and motor block were slower in group R than those in group L(P0.01);Upper sensory level at the side of surgery in the two groups was higher than another side (P0.001);Duration of analgesia and motor recovery were shorter in group R than those in group L(P0.01);The ratio of Bromage 2 and Bromage 3 was lower in group R than that in group L(P0.05);Consumption of local anesthetics was more in group R than group L(P0.01).There were no significant hemodynamic changes in the two groups compared with baseline values (P0.05);The incidenxes of side effects during and after operation were low and there were no significant differences between the two groups. (P0.05).Conclusion Continuous spinal anesthesia with hypobaric ropivacaine and levobupivacaine is safe and effective for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Anesthesia, Heart rate, Motor block, Spinal anesthesia, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility study of continuous spinal anesthesia for lower limb joint replacement in elderly patients with hypobaric ropivacaine and evobupivacaine — Research Paper | ScholarLens