The Simpicity of Antitrust Law
Richard M. Steuer
Abstract
Open-access reader
Richard M. Steuer
Abstract
Open-access reader
Antitrust law has grown increasingly complex, leading some to the misperception that it is often irrational and varies widely from one country to the next.In fact, antitrust is simpler than it seems.Properly applied, antitrust law focuses simply, and entirely, on combating two of the most innate proclivities in human nature-bullying and ganging up-when such conduct harms competition.Once this is understood, the concerns expressed about irrationality and disharmony begin to disappear.If it is true that all we really need to know we learned in kindergarten, 1 then all we really need to know about antitrust law we learned there too. I. IT'S SIMPLER THAN ONE MIGHT THINKOn the surface, antitrust seems more complex than this.Since the seminal case of Mitchel v. Reynolds 2 was decided in 1711 and the Sherman Act 3 was passed in 1890, antitrust terminology has grown increasingly complicated.Today, there is a profusion of jargon for antitrust offenses, from abuse of dominance 4 and bundling 5 to technological tying 6 and unilateral effects, 7 plus a host of acronyms and abbreviations such as SSNIPs, 8 HHIs, 9 and UPP. 10 Economics, including econometrics and
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Antitrust law has grown increasingly complex, leading some to the misperception that it is often irrational and varies widely from one country to the next.In fact, antitrust is simpler than it seems.Properly applied, antitrust law focuses simply, and entirely, on combating two of the most innate proclivities in human nature-bullying and ganging up-when such conduct harms competition.Once this is understood, the concerns expressed about irrationality and disharmony begin to disappear.If it is true that all we really need to know we learned in kindergarten, 1 then all we really need to know about antitrust law we learned there too. I. IT'S SIMPLER THAN ONE MIGHT THINKOn the surface, antitrust seems more complex than this.Since the seminal case of Mitchel v. Reynolds 2 was decided in 1711 and the Sherman Act 3 was passed in 1890, antitrust terminology has grown increasingly complicated.Today, there is a profusion of jargon for antitrust offenses, from abuse of dominance 4 and bundling 5 to technological tying 6 and unilateral effects, 7 plus a host of acronyms and abbreviations such as SSNIPs, 8 HHIs, 9 and UPP. 10 Economics, including econometrics and
Key concepts: Law, Political science, Business