2000Chinese Heart JournalRequires access

Comparative study on atrial functional refractory period and atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period in the dog

Zhao Gui

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to observe further electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular (AV) conduction,We compared atrial functional refractory peroid (AFRP) and atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period (AVNERP) in 8 dogs. AV condution was assessed by atrial extrastimulus technique using at least two basic cycle lengths. The electophysiologic parameters were recorded before and after administering intravenous Metoprolol to block the β receptor in the heart, and plotted into the AV conduction curve. As a result,the AVNERP could not be measured in any dog. AV conduction curve showed significant changes before and after the administration of Metoprolol at equivalent basic cycle length,AFRP also showed significant prolongation. It domonstrated that the refractory periods of cardiac conduction are obvious difference in different species. The properties that AVNERP is permanently shorter than AFRP in the dog may be functional manifestation of its physiologic characteristics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to observe further electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular (AV) conduction,We compared atrial functional refractory peroid (AFRP) and atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period (AVNERP) in 8 dogs. AV condution was assessed by atrial extrastimulus technique using at least two basic cycle lengths. The electophysiologic parameters were recorded before and after administering intravenous Metoprolol to block the β receptor in the heart, and plotted into the AV conduction curve. As a result,the AVNERP could not be measured in any dog. AV conduction curve showed significant changes before and after the administration of Metoprolol at equivalent basic cycle length,AFRP also showed significant prolongation. It domonstrated that the refractory periods of cardiac conduction are obvious difference in different species. The properties that AVNERP is permanently shorter than AFRP in the dog may be functional manifestation of its physiologic characteristics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to observe further electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular (AV) conduction,We compared atrial functional refractory peroid (AFRP) and atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period (AVNERP) in 8 dogs. AV condution was assessed by atrial extrastimulus technique using at least two basic cycle lengths. The electophysiologic parameters were recorded before and after administering intravenous Metoprolol to block the β receptor in the heart, and plotted into the AV conduction curve. As a result,the AVNERP could not be measured in any dog. AV conduction curve showed significant changes before and after the administration of Metoprolol at equivalent basic cycle length,AFRP also showed significant prolongation. It domonstrated that the refractory periods of cardiac conduction are obvious difference in different species. The properties that AVNERP is permanently shorter than AFRP in the dog may be functional manifestation of its physiologic characteristics.

Key concepts: Refractory period, Effective refractory period, Refractory (planetary science), Metoprolol, Cardiology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Atrioventricular block

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on atrial functional refractory period and atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period in the dog — Research Paper | ScholarLens