2006PubMedRequires access

[Structural characteristics of arthropod community in grapery].

Yunding Zou, Changgen Li, Shoudong Bi, Houzhang Wu, Xiangyang Chen, Fen Li, Xiazhi Zhou, Xuefei Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

By the method of principal component analysis, this paper analyzed the characteristic parameters of arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery. The results showed that in the first principal component, the contribution of arthropod community, phytophagous sub-community and predacious sub-community was 66.70%, 73.39% and 54.17%, respectively. For arthropod community, the absolute values of normalized regressive coefficients of individuals' number N, Hill diversity index N1, Hill diversity index N2 and McIntosh index D(mc) were larger, indicating their greater contribution on the community. For phytophagous sub-community, N, N1, N2, N and S (total species) had greater contribution; while for predacious sub-community, the greater contribution was made by N1, N2, Shannon-Wiener diversity index H' and abundance R. Synthetically, N2 and N1 had greater contribution on the arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery, comparing with other characteristic parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By the method of principal component analysis, this paper analyzed the characteristic parameters of arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery. The results showed that in the first principal component, the contribution of arthropod community, phytophagous sub-community and predacious sub-community was 66.70%, 73.39% and 54.17%, respectively. For arthropod community, the absolute values of normalized regressive coefficients of individuals' number N, Hill diversity index N1, Hill diversity index N2 and McIntosh index D(mc) were larger, indicating their greater contribution on the community. For phytophagous sub-community, N, N1, N2, N and S (total species) had greater contribution; while for predacious sub-community, the greater contribution was made by N1, N2, Shannon-Wiener diversity index H' and abundance R. Synthetically, N2 and N1 had greater contribution on the arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery, comparing with other characteristic parameters.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By the method of principal component analysis, this paper analyzed the characteristic parameters of arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery. The results showed that in the first principal component, the contribution of arthropod community, phytophagous sub-community and predacious sub-community was 66.70%, 73.39% and 54.17%, respectively. For arthropod community, the absolute values of normalized regressive coefficients of individuals' number N, Hill diversity index N1, Hill diversity index N2 and McIntosh index D(mc) were larger, indicating their greater contribution on the community. For phytophagous sub-community, N, N1, N2, N and S (total species) had greater contribution; while for predacious sub-community, the greater contribution was made by N1, N2, Shannon-Wiener diversity index H' and abundance R. Synthetically, N2 and N1 had greater contribution on the arthropod community and its phytophagous and predacious sub-communities in grapery, comparing with other characteristic parameters.

Key concepts: Arthropod, Diversity index, Community structure, Biology, Principal component analysis, Ecology, Diversity (politics), Abundance (ecology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Structural characteristics of arthropod community in grapery]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens