2009Academic Journal of Second Military Medical UniversityRequires access

Cisatracurium versus rocuronium in tracheal intubation for general anesthesia

Xiaoming Deng

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the efficiencies of cisatracurium and rocuronium during tracheal intubation for general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups in which patients received a single bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg(A group,n=20),cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg(B group,n=20),or 0.15 mg/kg(C group,n=20).Anesthesia was induced with midazolam,etomidate,and fentanyl.Neuromuscular function was assessed using accelerography with TOF.First twitch(T1) was used as the study parameter.Patients received a rapid bolus administration of study drugs within 10 seconds after T1 became stable at 100%;meanwhile,mask oxygen inhalation was offered for 2 min and then intubation was carried out.The systolic pressure,diastolic pressure,and heart rate were recorded at baseline level,before and 1,2,3,4,5,10,and 15 min after intubation.The intubation conditions were assessed.Whether intubation could be carried out successfully or not and T1 25% recovery time after the initial bolus were also recorded.The adverse effects and respiratory complication during operation and after operation were observed.Results:The hemodynamic changes within 15 min after intubation were not significantly different compared with those before induction in 3 groups(P0.05).Maximal neuromuscular block rates in group A,B,and C were(99.4±2.7)%,(99.1±1.9)%,and(99.9±0.3)%,respectively,with no significant differences found between the three groups(P0.05);the onset time periods of the 3 groups were(1.9±1.1) min,(3.6±2.1) min,and(3.3±1.5) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than those of B and C groups(P0.05);the time periods of clinical effects were(35.7±11.6) min,(35.2±13.0) min,and(50.9±15.1) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than that of group C(P0.05) and with no significant difference found between group A and group B(P0.05).The glottis exposure degree in group A was significantly better than that of B and C groups(P0.05).The successful rates of initial intubation were similar between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion:Rocuronium is superior to cisatracurium in induction intubating for general anesthesia in terms of clinical effect time and glottis exposure degree,and it can provide better intubating conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the efficiencies of cisatracurium and rocuronium during tracheal intubation for general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups in which patients received a single bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg(A group,n=20),cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg(B group,n=20),or 0.15 mg/kg(C group,n=20).Anesthesia was induced with midazolam,etomidate,and fentanyl.Neuromuscular function was assessed using accelerography with TOF.First twitch(T1) was used as the study parameter.Patients received a rapid bolus administration of study drugs within 10 seconds after T1 became stable at 100%;meanwhile,mask oxygen inhalation was offered for 2 min and then intubation was carried out.The systolic pressure,diastolic pressure,and heart rate were recorded at baseline level,before and 1,2,3,4,5,10,and 15 min after intubation.The intubation conditions were assessed.Whether intubation could be carried out successfully or not and T1 25% recovery time after the initial bolus were also recorded.The adverse effects and respiratory complication during operation and after operation were observed.Results:The hemodynamic changes within 15 min after intubation were not significantly different compared with those before induction in 3 groups(P0.05).Maximal neuromuscular block rates in group A,B,and C were(99.4±2.7)%,(99.1±1.9)%,and(99.9±0.3)%,respectively,with no significant differences found between the three groups(P0.05);the onset time periods of the 3 groups were(1.9±1.1) min,(3.6±2.1) min,and(3.3±1.5) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than those of B and C groups(P0.05);the time periods of clinical effects were(35.7±11.6) min,(35.2±13.0) min,and(50.9±15.1) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than that of group C(P0.05) and with no significant difference found between group A and group B(P0.05).The glottis exposure degree in group A was significantly better than that of B and C groups(P0.05).The successful rates of initial intubation were similar between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion:Rocuronium is superior to cisatracurium in induction intubating for general anesthesia in terms of clinical effect time and glottis exposure degree,and it can provide better intubating conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the efficiencies of cisatracurium and rocuronium during tracheal intubation for general anesthesia.Methods:Sixty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups in which patients received a single bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg(A group,n=20),cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg(B group,n=20),or 0.15 mg/kg(C group,n=20).Anesthesia was induced with midazolam,etomidate,and fentanyl.Neuromuscular function was assessed using accelerography with TOF.First twitch(T1) was used as the study parameter.Patients received a rapid bolus administration of study drugs within 10 seconds after T1 became stable at 100%;meanwhile,mask oxygen inhalation was offered for 2 min and then intubation was carried out.The systolic pressure,diastolic pressure,and heart rate were recorded at baseline level,before and 1,2,3,4,5,10,and 15 min after intubation.The intubation conditions were assessed.Whether intubation could be carried out successfully or not and T1 25% recovery time after the initial bolus were also recorded.The adverse effects and respiratory complication during operation and after operation were observed.Results:The hemodynamic changes within 15 min after intubation were not significantly different compared with those before induction in 3 groups(P0.05).Maximal neuromuscular block rates in group A,B,and C were(99.4±2.7)%,(99.1±1.9)%,and(99.9±0.3)%,respectively,with no significant differences found between the three groups(P0.05);the onset time periods of the 3 groups were(1.9±1.1) min,(3.6±2.1) min,and(3.3±1.5) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than those of B and C groups(P0.05);the time periods of clinical effects were(35.7±11.6) min,(35.2±13.0) min,and(50.9±15.1) min,respectively,with that of group A significantly shorter than that of group C(P0.05) and with no significant difference found between group A and group B(P0.05).The glottis exposure degree in group A was significantly better than that of B and C groups(P0.05).The successful rates of initial intubation were similar between the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion:Rocuronium is superior to cisatracurium in induction intubating for general anesthesia in terms of clinical effect time and glottis exposure degree,and it can provide better intubating conditions.

Key concepts: Rocuronium, Medicine, Fentanyl, Anesthesia, Intubation, Midazolam, Tracheal intubation, Bolus (digestion)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cisatracurium versus rocuronium in tracheal intubation for general anesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens