2010Zhongguo xin yao zazhiRequires access

Comparison of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin(5-FU/LV) plus oxaliplatin in the treatment of 75 patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Zhuang Xiao-wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the near efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine(XELOX) regimen with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin(5-FU/LV)(FOLFOX4) regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: Totally 75 patients with metastatic and recurring colorectal cancer were enrolled into this study.Patients were randomly divided into XELOX(n=37) and FOLFOX4(n=38) groups.Patients in XELOX group were treated with capecitabine 1 000 mg·m-2,po,bid,for 14 days,and oxaliplatin 130 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1.Patients in FOLFOX4 group were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1;LV 200 mg·m-2,ivgtt,for 2 h followed by 5-FU 400 mg·m-2(bolus) and 5-FU 600 mg·m-2(22 h-coutinous infusion),on d 1,2.XELOX regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for one cycle;FOLFOX4 regimen was repeated every 2 weeks,and 4 weeks for one cycle.All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least.The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO standards.Results: All 75 patients were available for evaluating objective response.In XELOX group,the overall response rate was 48.6%(CR:3,PR:15);the median time to progression(TTP) was 6.12 months;the median survival time(MST) was 13.7 months.In FOLFOX4 group,the overall response rate was 50.0%(CR:3,PR:16);TTP was 5.91 months;MST was 13.9 months.The toxicities were well tolerated.In XELOX group,the major side effects were gastrointestinal tract reactions,myelosuppression,stomasitis,and alopecia;their incidence rates were significant lower than those in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05).The peripheral nerve toxicity and thrombocytopenia incidence rate were not significantly different between two group.The incidence rate of hand-foot syndrome was higher in XELOX group than in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05),but the severity was less(grade I~II).Conclusion: The response rate is not significantly different between the two regimens.XELOX regimen is safer and its use is more convenient than FOLFOX4 regimen.Thus,XELOX regimen is worth recommending as a first-line therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the near efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine(XELOX) regimen with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin(5-FU/LV)(FOLFOX4) regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: Totally 75 patients with metastatic and recurring colorectal cancer were enrolled into this study.Patients were randomly divided into XELOX(n=37) and FOLFOX4(n=38) groups.Patients in XELOX group were treated with capecitabine 1 000 mg·m-2,po,bid,for 14 days,and oxaliplatin 130 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1.Patients in FOLFOX4 group were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1;LV 200 mg·m-2,ivgtt,for 2 h followed by 5-FU 400 mg·m-2(bolus) and 5-FU 600 mg·m-2(22 h-coutinous infusion),on d 1,2.XELOX regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for one cycle;FOLFOX4 regimen was repeated every 2 weeks,and 4 weeks for one cycle.All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least.The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO standards.Results: All 75 patients were available for evaluating objective response.In XELOX group,the overall response rate was 48.6%(CR:3,PR:15);the median time to progression(TTP) was 6.12 months;the median survival time(MST) was 13.7 months.In FOLFOX4 group,the overall response rate was 50.0%(CR:3,PR:16);TTP was 5.91 months;MST was 13.9 months.The toxicities were well tolerated.In XELOX group,the major side effects were gastrointestinal tract reactions,myelosuppression,stomasitis,and alopecia;their incidence rates were significant lower than those in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05).The peripheral nerve toxicity and thrombocytopenia incidence rate were not significantly different between two group.The incidence rate of hand-foot syndrome was higher in XELOX group than in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05),but the severity was less(grade I~II).Conclusion: The response rate is not significantly different between the two regimens.XELOX regimen is safer and its use is more convenient than FOLFOX4 regimen.Thus,XELOX regimen is worth recommending as a first-line therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the near efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine(XELOX) regimen with oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin(5-FU/LV)(FOLFOX4) regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: Totally 75 patients with metastatic and recurring colorectal cancer were enrolled into this study.Patients were randomly divided into XELOX(n=37) and FOLFOX4(n=38) groups.Patients in XELOX group were treated with capecitabine 1 000 mg·m-2,po,bid,for 14 days,and oxaliplatin 130 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1.Patients in FOLFOX4 group were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg·m-2,ivgtt,on d 1;LV 200 mg·m-2,ivgtt,for 2 h followed by 5-FU 400 mg·m-2(bolus) and 5-FU 600 mg·m-2(22 h-coutinous infusion),on d 1,2.XELOX regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for one cycle;FOLFOX4 regimen was repeated every 2 weeks,and 4 weeks for one cycle.All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least.The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO standards.Results: All 75 patients were available for evaluating objective response.In XELOX group,the overall response rate was 48.6%(CR:3,PR:15);the median time to progression(TTP) was 6.12 months;the median survival time(MST) was 13.7 months.In FOLFOX4 group,the overall response rate was 50.0%(CR:3,PR:16);TTP was 5.91 months;MST was 13.9 months.The toxicities were well tolerated.In XELOX group,the major side effects were gastrointestinal tract reactions,myelosuppression,stomasitis,and alopecia;their incidence rates were significant lower than those in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05).The peripheral nerve toxicity and thrombocytopenia incidence rate were not significantly different between two group.The incidence rate of hand-foot syndrome was higher in XELOX group than in FOLFOX4 group(P0.05),but the severity was less(grade I~II).Conclusion: The response rate is not significantly different between the two regimens.XELOX regimen is safer and its use is more convenient than FOLFOX4 regimen.Thus,XELOX regimen is worth recommending as a first-line therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Key concepts: Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, Medicine, Regimen, Fluorouracil, Internal medicine, Colorectal cancer, Bolus (digestion)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin(5-FU/LV) plus oxaliplatin in the treatment of 75 patients with advanced colorectal cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens