2004•Hu'nan Shifan Daxue Jiaoyu Kexue xuebaoRequires access

WTO and Law Education Reform in China

Xiongfei Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

After China joined into WTO, the reform of law education system must be advanced objectively. Law education in China should grasp the historical chance of China's access to WTO, renew its training goal and adjust the disposal structure of education resources rationally. At the same time, the law education should be built as the gatekeeper of law professional. Furthermore, the authors also realized that it is important to disposing the relationship between public management and academic autonomy reasonably.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After China joined into WTO, the reform of law education system must be advanced objectively. Law education in China should grasp the historical chance of China's access to WTO, renew its training goal and adjust the disposal structure of education resources rationally. At the same time, the law education should be built as the gatekeeper of law professional. Furthermore, the authors also realized that it is important to disposing the relationship between public management and academic autonomy reasonably.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After China joined into WTO, the reform of law education system must be advanced objectively. Law education in China should grasp the historical chance of China's access to WTO, renew its training goal and adjust the disposal structure of education resources rationally. At the same time, the law education should be built as the gatekeeper of law professional. Furthermore, the authors also realized that it is important to disposing the relationship between public management and academic autonomy reasonably.

Key concepts: China, Autonomy, GRASP, Political science, Law, Public law, Public administration, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WTO and Law Education Reform in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens