2003•PubMedRequires access

[Simultaneous double free flap transfer for extensive defects in head and neck region: a review of 33 consecutive cases].

Chi Mao, Guang‐Yan Yu, Xin Peng, Chuan-bin Guo, Min-xian Huang, Yi Zhang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rationale and feasibility of double free flap transfers for reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive cases of double free flap transfers for extensive head and neck defects from March 2000 to January 2002 were reviewed. Data concerning the operation included date of surgery, defect description and site, choice and combination of flap, recipient vessel and complications. RESULTS: The fibula osteocutaneous-radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap combination was most commonly used (n = 23), followed by the fibula osteocutaneous-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n = 6) and radial forearm-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap(n = 4). The complete flap survival rate was 97.0% (64 of 66 flaps). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, the double free flap procedure for reconstruction of massive head and neck defect is justified and effective, and greatly improve the quality of life for these patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rationale and feasibility of double free flap transfers for reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive cases of double free flap transfers for extensive head and neck defects from March 2000 to January 2002 were reviewed. Data concerning the operation included date of surgery, defect description and site, choice and combination of flap, recipient vessel and complications. RESULTS: The fibula osteocutaneous-radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap combination was most commonly used (n = 23), followed by the fibula osteocutaneous-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n = 6) and radial forearm-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap(n = 4). The complete flap survival rate was 97.0% (64 of 66 flaps). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, the double free flap procedure for reconstruction of massive head and neck defect is justified and effective, and greatly improve the quality of life for these patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rationale and feasibility of double free flap transfers for reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive cases of double free flap transfers for extensive head and neck defects from March 2000 to January 2002 were reviewed. Data concerning the operation included date of surgery, defect description and site, choice and combination of flap, recipient vessel and complications. RESULTS: The fibula osteocutaneous-radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap combination was most commonly used (n = 23), followed by the fibula osteocutaneous-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n = 6) and radial forearm-rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap(n = 4). The complete flap survival rate was 97.0% (64 of 66 flaps). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, the double free flap procedure for reconstruction of massive head and neck defect is justified and effective, and greatly improve the quality of life for these patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Head and neck, Surgery, Fibula, Free flap, Forearm, Tibia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Simultaneous double free flap transfer for extensive defects in head and neck region: a review of 33 consecutive cases]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens