2012•Journal of Southwest China Normal UniversityRequires access

A Dynamic Comparison on Industrial Structure of Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai,and Chongqing

Guo Qiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There is a gap in the economic development among four municipalities-Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai and Chongqing.One important reason is the strengths and weaknesses of their industrial structure.By means of industrial structure entropy,it has been analyzed in the paper that the dynamics differences in industrial structure in the four cities.Then,four-component share-shift model is used to evaluate the impact of industrial structure,competition power and distribution factors on economic growth of the four municipalities.The conclusion is that: Beijing's industrial structure is at the highest level;Shanghai's tertiary industry has not yet come into full play;Tianjin and Chongqing have great advantages in the second industry.However,the evolution of Tianjin's industrial structure is lack of the vitality,and the features of industrial development are inconspicuous and services industry lags behind in Chongqing.In the end,Beijing should pay attention to the development of High-end Industries;Shanghai should strengthen innovation to improve the competitiveness of the modern service industry;Tianjin should strengthen the development of modern industry and modern service industry;and Chongqing needs to develop locally-featured industries actively and promote the deep integration between manufacturing and service industries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a gap in the economic development among four municipalities-Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai and Chongqing.One important reason is the strengths and weaknesses of their industrial structure.By means of industrial structure entropy,it has been analyzed in the paper that the dynamics differences in industrial structure in the four cities.Then,four-component share-shift model is used to evaluate the impact of industrial structure,competition power and distribution factors on economic growth of the four municipalities.The conclusion is that: Beijing's industrial structure is at the highest level;Shanghai's tertiary industry has not yet come into full play;Tianjin and Chongqing have great advantages in the second industry.However,the evolution of Tianjin's industrial structure is lack of the vitality,and the features of industrial development are inconspicuous and services industry lags behind in Chongqing.In the end,Beijing should pay attention to the development of High-end Industries;Shanghai should strengthen innovation to improve the competitiveness of the modern service industry;Tianjin should strengthen the development of modern industry and modern service industry;and Chongqing needs to develop locally-featured industries actively and promote the deep integration between manufacturing and service industries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a gap in the economic development among four municipalities-Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai and Chongqing.One important reason is the strengths and weaknesses of their industrial structure.By means of industrial structure entropy,it has been analyzed in the paper that the dynamics differences in industrial structure in the four cities.Then,four-component share-shift model is used to evaluate the impact of industrial structure,competition power and distribution factors on economic growth of the four municipalities.The conclusion is that: Beijing's industrial structure is at the highest level;Shanghai's tertiary industry has not yet come into full play;Tianjin and Chongqing have great advantages in the second industry.However,the evolution of Tianjin's industrial structure is lack of the vitality,and the features of industrial development are inconspicuous and services industry lags behind in Chongqing.In the end,Beijing should pay attention to the development of High-end Industries;Shanghai should strengthen innovation to improve the competitiveness of the modern service industry;Tianjin should strengthen the development of modern industry and modern service industry;and Chongqing needs to develop locally-featured industries actively and promote the deep integration between manufacturing and service industries.

Key concepts: Beijing, Tertiary sector of the economy, Business, Competition (biology), Vitality, Service (business), Industrial organization, Manufacturing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Dynamic Comparison on Industrial Structure of Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai,and Chongqing — Research Paper | ScholarLens