Cost-Minimization Analysis of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Sodium vs. Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia
Zhenghua Jiang
Abstract
Zhenghua Jiang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the economic effects of cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium and moxifloxacin for community acquired pneumonia.METHODS:92 patients with community acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium for injection(Group A) or moxifloxacin injection(Group B),respectively.In both groups the observation of curative effects and safety and the pharmacoeconomic analysis were conducted.RESULTS:The effective rates of two groups were 86.00% and 92.86%(P0.05),respectively.The average cost was 1 314.8 yuan in Group A versus 3 306.5 yuan in Group B(P0.05).CONCLUSION:The therapy of Group A is more benefit between two groups.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the economic effects of cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium and moxifloxacin for community acquired pneumonia.METHODS:92 patients with community acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium for injection(Group A) or moxifloxacin injection(Group B),respectively.In both groups the observation of curative effects and safety and the pharmacoeconomic analysis were conducted.RESULTS:The effective rates of two groups were 86.00% and 92.86%(P0.05),respectively.The average cost was 1 314.8 yuan in Group A versus 3 306.5 yuan in Group B(P0.05).CONCLUSION:The therapy of Group A is more benefit between two groups.
Key concepts: Moxifloxacin, Cefoperazone, Medicine, Community-acquired pneumonia, Cost-minimization analysis, Pneumonia, Sulbactam, Internal medicine