2012•journal of physical educationOpen access

Remedies for defects in arbitral tribunal formation by the Court of Arbitration for Sport——An interpretation based on CAS arbitration codes and rules

Hui Huang

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The arbitral tribunal formation system is a critical part of the international sports arbitration system;problems it has in terms of independency,confidentiality and quickness are 3 major defects in arbitral tribunal formation.Whereas the quality of an arbitral tribunal is closely related to the quality of arbitration,various arbitration systems,which include CAS arbitration codes and Olympic arbitration rules,are all striving to set up a arbitral tribunal formation defect remedy system.The remedy system includes such 3 aspects as remedy subject,remedy measure and remedy effect;based on such a system,ways of remedying in which the party concerned,arbitral tribunal,arbitral organization and juridical authority take comprehensive measures such as evading,recusing,replacing and regrouping solely or interactively.Arbitration acts done by an arbitral tribunal have the effect of being traced as invalid totally or partially in terms of procedure and entity based on the types of its defects,and the arbitrators will undertake corresponding responsibilities based on the types of mistakes they make.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The arbitral tribunal formation system is a critical part of the international sports arbitration system;problems it has in terms of independency,confidentiality and quickness are 3 major defects in arbitral tribunal formation.Whereas the quality of an arbitral tribunal is closely related to the quality of arbitration,various arbitration systems,which include CAS arbitration codes and Olympic arbitration rules,are all striving to set up a arbitral tribunal formation defect remedy system.The remedy system includes such 3 aspects as remedy subject,remedy measure and remedy effect;based on such a system,ways of remedying in which the party concerned,arbitral tribunal,arbitral organization and juridical authority take comprehensive measures such as evading,recusing,replacing and regrouping solely or interactively.Arbitration acts done by an arbitral tribunal have the effect of being traced as invalid totally or partially in terms of procedure and entity based on the types of its defects,and the arbitrators will undertake corresponding responsibilities based on the types of mistakes they make.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The arbitral tribunal formation system is a critical part of the international sports arbitration system;problems it has in terms of independency,confidentiality and quickness are 3 major defects in arbitral tribunal formation.Whereas the quality of an arbitral tribunal is closely related to the quality of arbitration,various arbitration systems,which include CAS arbitration codes and Olympic arbitration rules,are all striving to set up a arbitral tribunal formation defect remedy system.The remedy system includes such 3 aspects as remedy subject,remedy measure and remedy effect;based on such a system,ways of remedying in which the party concerned,arbitral tribunal,arbitral organization and juridical authority take comprehensive measures such as evading,recusing,replacing and regrouping solely or interactively.Arbitration acts done by an arbitral tribunal have the effect of being traced as invalid totally or partially in terms of procedure and entity based on the types of its defects,and the arbitrators will undertake corresponding responsibilities based on the types of mistakes they make.

Key concepts: Tribunal, Arbitration, Law, Compulsory arbitration, Interpretation (philosophy), Confidentiality, Business, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Remedies for defects in arbitral tribunal formation by the Court of Arbitration for Sport——An interpretation based on CAS arbitration codes and rules — Research Paper | ScholarLens