ScholarLens Back to search
2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

A Probe into the Classifcation of Singing into Bel Canto, Folk Singing and Pop Singing

Zhou Shu-zhe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aesthetic habit results in the conventional recognition of the classification of singing into 3 forms. Yet the classification will hinder the development of singing art. It is proved that the classification is not scientific because there is only one way to sing—the scientific singing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aesthetic habit results in the conventional recognition of the classification of singing into 3 forms. Yet the classification will hinder the development of singing art. It is proved that the classification is not scientific because there is only one way to sing—the scientific singing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aesthetic habit results in the conventional recognition of the classification of singing into 3 forms. Yet the classification will hinder the development of singing art. It is proved that the classification is not scientific because there is only one way to sing—the scientific singing.

Key concepts: Singing, Canto, Habit, Communication, Art, Aesthetics, History, Psychology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Probe into the Classifcation of Singing into Bel Canto, Folk Singing and Pop Singing — Research Paper | ScholarLens