2001Zhonghua xianwei waike zazhiRequires access

Partial median and ulnar nerve transfer for functional reconstruction in brachial plexus injury

XU Zhong-he

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To treat upper and middle trunks or C 5~7 avulsion of brachial plexus by neurotization using a part of median nerve and ulnar nerve Methods All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedures Eleven cases were involved in the first group The phrenic nerve was chosen to anastomose with musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft and the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed with suprascapular nerve Eleven cases from 1997 were classified into the second group A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to coapt with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to harvest with axillary nerve The cases were followed up from 0 5 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups Results There were 2 cases(16 6%)who got the recovery of M 4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group and 7 cases(63 6%)in the second group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 0 05) But it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups Conclusion Partial nerve transfer,phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer all were effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury,but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful muscle strength than the other nerve transfer procedures

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To treat upper and middle trunks or C 5~7 avulsion of brachial plexus by neurotization using a part of median nerve and ulnar nerve Methods All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedures Eleven cases were involved in the first group The phrenic nerve was chosen to anastomose with musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft and the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed with suprascapular nerve Eleven cases from 1997 were classified into the second group A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to coapt with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to harvest with axillary nerve The cases were followed up from 0 5 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups Results There were 2 cases(16 6%)who got the recovery of M 4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group and 7 cases(63 6%)in the second group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 0 05) But it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups Conclusion Partial nerve transfer,phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer all were effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury,but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful muscle strength than the other nerve transfer procedures

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To treat upper and middle trunks or C 5~7 avulsion of brachial plexus by neurotization using a part of median nerve and ulnar nerve Methods All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedures Eleven cases were involved in the first group The phrenic nerve was chosen to anastomose with musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft and the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed with suprascapular nerve Eleven cases from 1997 were classified into the second group A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to coapt with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to harvest with axillary nerve The cases were followed up from 0 5 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups Results There were 2 cases(16 6%)who got the recovery of M 4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group and 7 cases(63 6%)in the second group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 0 05) But it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups Conclusion Partial nerve transfer,phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer all were effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury,but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful muscle strength than the other nerve transfer procedures

Key concepts: Medicine, Musculocutaneous nerve, Brachial plexus, Axillary nerve, Ulnar nerve, Sural nerve, Phrenic nerve, Median nerve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Partial median and ulnar nerve transfer for functional reconstruction in brachial plexus injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens