Partial median and ulnar nerve transfer for functional reconstruction in brachial plexus injury
XU Zhong-he
Abstract
XU Zhong-he
Abstract
Objective To treat upper and middle trunks or C 5~7 avulsion of brachial plexus by neurotization using a part of median nerve and ulnar nerve Methods All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedures Eleven cases were involved in the first group The phrenic nerve was chosen to anastomose with musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft and the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed with suprascapular nerve Eleven cases from 1997 were classified into the second group A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to coapt with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to harvest with axillary nerve The cases were followed up from 0 5 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups Results There were 2 cases(16 6%)who got the recovery of M 4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group and 7 cases(63 6%)in the second group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 0 05) But it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups Conclusion Partial nerve transfer,phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer all were effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury,but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful muscle strength than the other nerve transfer procedures
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To treat upper and middle trunks or C 5~7 avulsion of brachial plexus by neurotization using a part of median nerve and ulnar nerve Methods All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedures Eleven cases were involved in the first group The phrenic nerve was chosen to anastomose with musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft and the spinal accessory nerve was anastomosed with suprascapular nerve Eleven cases from 1997 were classified into the second group A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to coapt with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to harvest with axillary nerve The cases were followed up from 0 5 to 3 years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups Results There were 2 cases(16 6%)who got the recovery of M 4 strength of biceps muscle in the first group and 7 cases(63 6%)in the second group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 0 05) But it was not statistically different in the recovery of shoulder function between the two groups Conclusion Partial nerve transfer,phrenic and spinal accessary nerve transfer all were effective for the reconstruction of elbow or shoulder function in brachial plexus injury,but the neurotization using a part of median nerve could obtain more powerful muscle strength than the other nerve transfer procedures
Key concepts: Medicine, Musculocutaneous nerve, Brachial plexus, Axillary nerve, Ulnar nerve, Sural nerve, Phrenic nerve, Median nerve