2008•Clinical Medical EngineeringRequires access

Semen Analysis and Sperm Morphology Analysis of Infertile Males

Xin Yue Tao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Retrospective analysis of semen and sperm morphology analysis, to prevent excessive clinical treatment for infertile couples. Methods Chose the infertile couples of out-patient department from Oct 1st 2007 to February 29th 2008. All males underwent semen analysis for at least 2 times and sperm morphology analysis for 1 time. Microsoft Excel was used for statistic analysis. Results Totally 1206 cases of semen analysis and 483 cases of sperm morphology were analyzed. Sperm concentration was 0-180 *109/L, with an average of 55.3±32.2*109/L, 75.1% were within 20-100*109/L, only 13.3% were oligozoospermia, and azoospermia accounted for 1.5%; 51.1% of the cases had 30% -50% rapid progressive sperms (a grade+b grade), and only 0.6% were normal according to the WHO standard (a grade+b grade 50%). Only 20.5% of the cases had 14% normal sperm morphology. Conclusion Except azoospermia which were obviously related to infertility, sperm concentration may not be a good indicator for assessment of infertility, but sperm activity and morphology may predict the infertility factors. Analysis of semen and sperm morphology should be used as the first screening method for out-patient infertile couples to prevent excessive treatment for the women.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Retrospective analysis of semen and sperm morphology analysis, to prevent excessive clinical treatment for infertile couples. Methods Chose the infertile couples of out-patient department from Oct 1st 2007 to February 29th 2008. All males underwent semen analysis for at least 2 times and sperm morphology analysis for 1 time. Microsoft Excel was used for statistic analysis. Results Totally 1206 cases of semen analysis and 483 cases of sperm morphology were analyzed. Sperm concentration was 0-180 *109/L, with an average of 55.3±32.2*109/L, 75.1% were within 20-100*109/L, only 13.3% were oligozoospermia, and azoospermia accounted for 1.5%; 51.1% of the cases had 30% -50% rapid progressive sperms (a grade+b grade), and only 0.6% were normal according to the WHO standard (a grade+b grade 50%). Only 20.5% of the cases had 14% normal sperm morphology. Conclusion Except azoospermia which were obviously related to infertility, sperm concentration may not be a good indicator for assessment of infertility, but sperm activity and morphology may predict the infertility factors. Analysis of semen and sperm morphology should be used as the first screening method for out-patient infertile couples to prevent excessive treatment for the women.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Retrospective analysis of semen and sperm morphology analysis, to prevent excessive clinical treatment for infertile couples. Methods Chose the infertile couples of out-patient department from Oct 1st 2007 to February 29th 2008. All males underwent semen analysis for at least 2 times and sperm morphology analysis for 1 time. Microsoft Excel was used for statistic analysis. Results Totally 1206 cases of semen analysis and 483 cases of sperm morphology were analyzed. Sperm concentration was 0-180 *109/L, with an average of 55.3±32.2*109/L, 75.1% were within 20-100*109/L, only 13.3% were oligozoospermia, and azoospermia accounted for 1.5%; 51.1% of the cases had 30% -50% rapid progressive sperms (a grade+b grade), and only 0.6% were normal according to the WHO standard (a grade+b grade 50%). Only 20.5% of the cases had 14% normal sperm morphology. Conclusion Except azoospermia which were obviously related to infertility, sperm concentration may not be a good indicator for assessment of infertility, but sperm activity and morphology may predict the infertility factors. Analysis of semen and sperm morphology should be used as the first screening method for out-patient infertile couples to prevent excessive treatment for the women.

Key concepts: Azoospermia, Sperm, Semen analysis, Semen, Medicine, Male infertility, Infertility, Andrology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Semen Analysis and Sperm Morphology Analysis of Infertile Males — Research Paper | ScholarLens