2012Chinese Journal of Practical StomatologyRequires access

Effect of cleanness at the root tip by using five different techniques in root canal preparation

Wei Gao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the ability of five techniques on cleanness at the apical third of root. Methods Sixty extracted single-rooted human teech ,randomly distributed into 6 groups ,were prepared by using Protaper rotary instruments and subjected to different techniques on removal of smear layer;hydrogen peroxide and normal saline( group A); 5.25%sodium hypochlorite(NAOCL) and ethylenediamine tetraacetis(EDTA) gel (group B),irrigation with ultrasonics(group C); with Nd:YAG laser( group D), EDTA gel and ultrasonics with normal saline irrigation (group E);EDTA gel and ultrasonics with 5.25% NAOCL irrigation ( group F). Samples were examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scored for cleanness at the apical third of root and the condition of dentin tubule. Results In group A the apical root and dentine tubules were covered by smear layer. The smear layer of the other 5 groups were cleared partly.There were significant difference bwteen group A and other groups(P 0.05). There were no significant difference between the group D and group E(P 0.05). There were significant difference among the other tested groups(P 0.05). Conclusion the smear layer at the root tip can be removed effectively by using chemical ,ultrasonics and Nd:YAG laser. EDTA gel combined with ultrasonics and 5.25% NAOCL irrigation (group F) was best.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the ability of five techniques on cleanness at the apical third of root. Methods Sixty extracted single-rooted human teech ,randomly distributed into 6 groups ,were prepared by using Protaper rotary instruments and subjected to different techniques on removal of smear layer;hydrogen peroxide and normal saline( group A); 5.25%sodium hypochlorite(NAOCL) and ethylenediamine tetraacetis(EDTA) gel (group B),irrigation with ultrasonics(group C); with Nd:YAG laser( group D), EDTA gel and ultrasonics with normal saline irrigation (group E);EDTA gel and ultrasonics with 5.25% NAOCL irrigation ( group F). Samples were examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scored for cleanness at the apical third of root and the condition of dentin tubule. Results In group A the apical root and dentine tubules were covered by smear layer. The smear layer of the other 5 groups were cleared partly.There were significant difference bwteen group A and other groups(P 0.05). There were no significant difference between the group D and group E(P 0.05). There were significant difference among the other tested groups(P 0.05). Conclusion the smear layer at the root tip can be removed effectively by using chemical ,ultrasonics and Nd:YAG laser. EDTA gel combined with ultrasonics and 5.25% NAOCL irrigation (group F) was best.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the ability of five techniques on cleanness at the apical third of root. Methods Sixty extracted single-rooted human teech ,randomly distributed into 6 groups ,were prepared by using Protaper rotary instruments and subjected to different techniques on removal of smear layer;hydrogen peroxide and normal saline( group A); 5.25%sodium hypochlorite(NAOCL) and ethylenediamine tetraacetis(EDTA) gel (group B),irrigation with ultrasonics(group C); with Nd:YAG laser( group D), EDTA gel and ultrasonics with normal saline irrigation (group E);EDTA gel and ultrasonics with 5.25% NAOCL irrigation ( group F). Samples were examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scored for cleanness at the apical third of root and the condition of dentin tubule. Results In group A the apical root and dentine tubules were covered by smear layer. The smear layer of the other 5 groups were cleared partly.There were significant difference bwteen group A and other groups(P 0.05). There were no significant difference between the group D and group E(P 0.05). There were significant difference among the other tested groups(P 0.05). Conclusion the smear layer at the root tip can be removed effectively by using chemical ,ultrasonics and Nd:YAG laser. EDTA gel combined with ultrasonics and 5.25% NAOCL irrigation (group F) was best.

Key concepts: Smear layer, Sodium hypochlorite, Dentistry, Root canal, Dentin, Saline, Clearance, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of cleanness at the root tip by using five different techniques in root canal preparation — Research Paper | ScholarLens