2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Experimental Study on the Protection of Brain Function by Cerebral Ischemic Preconditioning

Li Rong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the protection of brain function by cerebral ischemic preconditioning and the mechanisms involved in ischemic tolerance.MethodsSeventy four adult Wistar rats were randomly divided into six group:①Group A (blank control); Group B (experiment control); Group C (lethal ischemia); Group D (ischemic preconditioning);Group E (N 6 cyclopentyladenosine,CPA preconditioning); Group F(8 cyclopenty 1,3 dipropylxcenthine,DPCPX preconditioning). Brain ischemia model was induced by 4 vessel occlusion method as described by Pulsinelli et al.Both common carotid arteries of rats in Groups A,B,C,D were occluded or released with miniature aneurysm clips in order to control the time of brain ischemia or reperfusion; In Group E and F, two drugs? CPA and DPCPX preconditionings were carried out i.p. respectively in different duration before ischemia. was established .The brain tissues in each group were resected following reperfusion for 3 or 7 days after the special ischemic phases ,and neurons from the CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus were studied by morphological and immunohistochemical techniques of heat shock protein(HSP) respectively.ResultsThe CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group D (ischemic preconditioning) and Group E(CPA preconditioning) were protected fairly well, and results of their neuronal density were significantly higher than those of Group C (lethal ischemia)(P0.01), but expressions of HSP were visible within CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus in all three groups. The CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group F (DPCPX preconditioning) were destroyed severely, with negative immunoreaction for HSP 70; and their neuronal density was the lowest as compared with that in Groups A,D and E (P0.01).ConclusionCerebral ischemic preconditioning or prophylactic application with adenosine receptor A 1 agonist can produce obvious protective effects on brain function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ObjectivesTo explore the protection of brain function by cerebral ischemic preconditioning and the mechanisms involved in ischemic tolerance.MethodsSeventy four adult Wistar rats were randomly divided into six group:①Group A (blank control); Group B (experiment control); Group C (lethal ischemia); Group D (ischemic preconditioning);Group E (N 6 cyclopentyladenosine,CPA preconditioning); Group F(8 cyclopenty 1,3 dipropylxcenthine,DPCPX preconditioning). Brain ischemia model was induced by 4 vessel occlusion method as described by Pulsinelli et al.Both common carotid arteries of rats in Groups A,B,C,D were occluded or released with miniature aneurysm clips in order to control the time of brain ischemia or reperfusion; In Group E and F, two drugs? CPA and DPCPX preconditionings were carried out i.p. respectively in different duration before ischemia. was established .The brain tissues in each group were resected following reperfusion for 3 or 7 days after the special ischemic phases ,and neurons from the CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus were studied by morphological and immunohistochemical techniques of heat shock protein(HSP) respectively.ResultsThe CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group D (ischemic preconditioning) and Group E(CPA preconditioning) were protected fairly well, and results of their neuronal density were significantly higher than those of Group C (lethal ischemia)(P0.01), but expressions of HSP were visible within CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus in all three groups. The CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group F (DPCPX preconditioning) were destroyed severely, with negative immunoreaction for HSP 70; and their neuronal density was the lowest as compared with that in Groups A,D and E (P0.01).ConclusionCerebral ischemic preconditioning or prophylactic application with adenosine receptor A 1 agonist can produce obvious protective effects on brain function.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the protection of brain function by cerebral ischemic preconditioning and the mechanisms involved in ischemic tolerance.MethodsSeventy four adult Wistar rats were randomly divided into six group:①Group A (blank control); Group B (experiment control); Group C (lethal ischemia); Group D (ischemic preconditioning);Group E (N 6 cyclopentyladenosine,CPA preconditioning); Group F(8 cyclopenty 1,3 dipropylxcenthine,DPCPX preconditioning). Brain ischemia model was induced by 4 vessel occlusion method as described by Pulsinelli et al.Both common carotid arteries of rats in Groups A,B,C,D were occluded or released with miniature aneurysm clips in order to control the time of brain ischemia or reperfusion; In Group E and F, two drugs? CPA and DPCPX preconditionings were carried out i.p. respectively in different duration before ischemia. was established .The brain tissues in each group were resected following reperfusion for 3 or 7 days after the special ischemic phases ,and neurons from the CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus were studied by morphological and immunohistochemical techniques of heat shock protein(HSP) respectively.ResultsThe CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group D (ischemic preconditioning) and Group E(CPA preconditioning) were protected fairly well, and results of their neuronal density were significantly higher than those of Group C (lethal ischemia)(P0.01), but expressions of HSP were visible within CA Ⅰ region of hippocampus in all three groups. The CA Ⅰ region neurons of hippocampus in Group F (DPCPX preconditioning) were destroyed severely, with negative immunoreaction for HSP 70; and their neuronal density was the lowest as compared with that in Groups A,D and E (P0.01).ConclusionCerebral ischemic preconditioning or prophylactic application with adenosine receptor A 1 agonist can produce obvious protective effects on brain function.

Key concepts: Ischemic preconditioning, Ischemia, Hippocampus, Medicine, Anesthesia, Internal medicine, Occlusion, Hsp70

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental Study on the Protection of Brain Function by Cerebral Ischemic Preconditioning — Research Paper | ScholarLens