2004Applied Journal of General PracticeRequires access

A Comparative Study on Three Kinds of Artificial Prosthesis for Open Tension-free Hernioplasty

Yan Xie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the differences in results among Prolene Mesh, Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System in open tension-free hernioplasty. Methods A prospective comparative study was carried out. Sixty patients with inguinal hernia were divided into three groups: Prolene Mesh group, Perfix plug group, Prolene Hernia System group. Results No significant difference was found among the three groups in hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative discomfort and recurrence rate. The operation time in Prolene Hernia System was longer than the other two groups. The cost of operation in Prolene Mesh group was obviously the lowest. Conclusions The effect of Prolene Mesh was similar as Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System. The advantages are lower cost, simple and shorter operation time, so it's suitable for the local hospitals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the differences in results among Prolene Mesh, Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System in open tension-free hernioplasty. Methods A prospective comparative study was carried out. Sixty patients with inguinal hernia were divided into three groups: Prolene Mesh group, Perfix plug group, Prolene Hernia System group. Results No significant difference was found among the three groups in hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative discomfort and recurrence rate. The operation time in Prolene Hernia System was longer than the other two groups. The cost of operation in Prolene Mesh group was obviously the lowest. Conclusions The effect of Prolene Mesh was similar as Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System. The advantages are lower cost, simple and shorter operation time, so it's suitable for the local hospitals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the differences in results among Prolene Mesh, Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System in open tension-free hernioplasty. Methods A prospective comparative study was carried out. Sixty patients with inguinal hernia were divided into three groups: Prolene Mesh group, Perfix plug group, Prolene Hernia System group. Results No significant difference was found among the three groups in hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative discomfort and recurrence rate. The operation time in Prolene Hernia System was longer than the other two groups. The cost of operation in Prolene Mesh group was obviously the lowest. Conclusions The effect of Prolene Mesh was similar as Perfix plug and Prolene Hernia System. The advantages are lower cost, simple and shorter operation time, so it's suitable for the local hospitals.

Key concepts: Prolene, Medicine, Surgery, Prosthesis, Hernia, Inguinal hernia, Hernia repair, Clinical study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study on Three Kinds of Artificial Prosthesis for Open Tension-free Hernioplasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens