Dual Perspectives in the Rules of Civil Evidence
WU Ru-qiao
Abstract
WU Ru-qiao
Abstract
The enactment of the provisions of civil evidence have perfected our country's legislation of civil evidence to a large extent,however,many inadequacies still existed.The most notable was that it didn't divide the civil evidence act into the substantive and the procedural,and the present theoretical study of civil evidence act also doesn't concern about the problem.This article raises the view that we should divide the civil evidence act into two parts: the substantive and the procedural.It also defines them theoretically.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The enactment of the provisions of civil evidence have perfected our country's legislation of civil evidence to a large extent,however,many inadequacies still existed.The most notable was that it didn't divide the civil evidence act into the substantive and the procedural,and the present theoretical study of civil evidence act also doesn't concern about the problem.This article raises the view that we should divide the civil evidence act into two parts: the substantive and the procedural.It also defines them theoretically.
Key concepts: Civil procedure, Procedural law, Legislation, Political science, Dual (grammatical number), Law, Civil law (Civil law), Law and economics