2004Zhongguo yixue yingxiang jishuRequires access

Interventional therapy of Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic vein obstruction

Xu Wei

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of interventional therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic vein obstruction (HVBCS). Methods Eighty-three patients of HVBCS underwent inferior vena cava and hepatic venography. PTA, PTA and stenting, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) were used for treatment in 71 patients. Results All patients were divided into two types, those with central obstruction of hepatic veins (COHV, n =65),and those with extensive obstruction of hepatic veins (EOHV, n =18). Hepatic vein PTA alone ( n =46) or PTA and stenting ( n =19) were successfully performed in all patients of COHV. The symptoms and signs disappeared or markedly alleviated in 64 of 65 (99.2%) patients. During a 12-118 month follow up (mean 67 months), recurrence occurred in a total of 9 patients. Seven patients treated with PTA alone were treated again by stent placement. In 2 patients treated initially with stent placement, one underwent further PTA through the stent and the other failed to treat. TIPS placement was successful in all 6 consenting patients with EOHV. Clinical symptoms and signs showed dramatic improvement in 4 of 6 patients. Restenosis of the shunt developed in 2 patients during follow up. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion PTA or PTA and stenting are choices for treatment of the COHV with excellent results. TIPS placement can be offered as a modality for treatment of the EOHV, with common results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effect of interventional therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic vein obstruction (HVBCS). Methods Eighty-three patients of HVBCS underwent inferior vena cava and hepatic venography. PTA, PTA and stenting, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) were used for treatment in 71 patients. Results All patients were divided into two types, those with central obstruction of hepatic veins (COHV, n =65),and those with extensive obstruction of hepatic veins (EOHV, n =18). Hepatic vein PTA alone ( n =46) or PTA and stenting ( n =19) were successfully performed in all patients of COHV. The symptoms and signs disappeared or markedly alleviated in 64 of 65 (99.2%) patients. During a 12-118 month follow up (mean 67 months), recurrence occurred in a total of 9 patients. Seven patients treated with PTA alone were treated again by stent placement. In 2 patients treated initially with stent placement, one underwent further PTA through the stent and the other failed to treat. TIPS placement was successful in all 6 consenting patients with EOHV. Clinical symptoms and signs showed dramatic improvement in 4 of 6 patients. Restenosis of the shunt developed in 2 patients during follow up. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion PTA or PTA and stenting are choices for treatment of the COHV with excellent results. TIPS placement can be offered as a modality for treatment of the EOHV, with common results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of interventional therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic vein obstruction (HVBCS). Methods Eighty-three patients of HVBCS underwent inferior vena cava and hepatic venography. PTA, PTA and stenting, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) were used for treatment in 71 patients. Results All patients were divided into two types, those with central obstruction of hepatic veins (COHV, n =65),and those with extensive obstruction of hepatic veins (EOHV, n =18). Hepatic vein PTA alone ( n =46) or PTA and stenting ( n =19) were successfully performed in all patients of COHV. The symptoms and signs disappeared or markedly alleviated in 64 of 65 (99.2%) patients. During a 12-118 month follow up (mean 67 months), recurrence occurred in a total of 9 patients. Seven patients treated with PTA alone were treated again by stent placement. In 2 patients treated initially with stent placement, one underwent further PTA through the stent and the other failed to treat. TIPS placement was successful in all 6 consenting patients with EOHV. Clinical symptoms and signs showed dramatic improvement in 4 of 6 patients. Restenosis of the shunt developed in 2 patients during follow up. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusion PTA or PTA and stenting are choices for treatment of the COHV with excellent results. TIPS placement can be offered as a modality for treatment of the EOHV, with common results.

Key concepts: Medicine, Budd–Chiari syndrome, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, Venography, Stent, Surgery, Inferior vena cava, Restenosis

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interventional therapy of Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic vein obstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens