2011Xiandai shengwu yixue jinzhanRequires access

Analysis of Treating Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Minimally Invasive Surgery

Wang Jian-jiao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive surgery and conventional craniotomy for hypertensive intracere-bral hemorrhage.Methods: Retrospective analysis from May 2005 to July 2009 during craniotomy in 39 cases and 44 cases of minimally invasive surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage,comparing the effect of two ways.Results: Both minimally invasive surgery group and conventional craniotomy group have received good effect,but there was no significant difference.Conclusions: There was no significant difference between minimally invasive surgery group and craniotomy group,but minimally invasive surgery is simple,small size of trauma,lower cost,well tolerated in patients,so it is worth promoting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive surgery and conventional craniotomy for hypertensive intracere-bral hemorrhage.Methods: Retrospective analysis from May 2005 to July 2009 during craniotomy in 39 cases and 44 cases of minimally invasive surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage,comparing the effect of two ways.Results: Both minimally invasive surgery group and conventional craniotomy group have received good effect,but there was no significant difference.Conclusions: There was no significant difference between minimally invasive surgery group and craniotomy group,but minimally invasive surgery is simple,small size of trauma,lower cost,well tolerated in patients,so it is worth promoting.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive surgery and conventional craniotomy for hypertensive intracere-bral hemorrhage.Methods: Retrospective analysis from May 2005 to July 2009 during craniotomy in 39 cases and 44 cases of minimally invasive surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage,comparing the effect of two ways.Results: Both minimally invasive surgery group and conventional craniotomy group have received good effect,but there was no significant difference.Conclusions: There was no significant difference between minimally invasive surgery group and craniotomy group,but minimally invasive surgery is simple,small size of trauma,lower cost,well tolerated in patients,so it is worth promoting.

Key concepts: Medicine, Craniotomy, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Invasive surgery, Surgery, Significant difference, Anesthesia, Glasgow Coma Scale

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Treating Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Minimally Invasive Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens