Comparative analysis of image quality and radiation dose in patients with high heart rate with prospective versus retrospective electrocardiography gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography
Wang Liangjion
Abstract
Wang Liangjion
Abstract
Objective Tocomparetheimagequalityandradiationdosewithprospectiveversusretrospectiveelectrocardiography gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography,for optimizing the scan protocols of coronary angiography CTA. Methods Sixty patients with heart rate between 70 and 90 beats/min were randomly divided into prospectively ECG-gated group(group A) and retrospectively ECG-gated group(group B), their image quality and radiation dose were compared.Results The percent of qualified image in group A and B was 93.7%(253/270)and 99.3%(268/270), respectively, with a significant difference( 0.05).Effective dose of group A and B was(4.020±0.463)mSv and(16.649±1.232)mSv, respectively, with a significant difference( 0.05).Conclusions Radiation dose in prospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography was lower than that of retrospectively one.But the image quality of prospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography was worse than that of retrospectively one in patients with high heart rate.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective Tocomparetheimagequalityandradiationdosewithprospectiveversusretrospectiveelectrocardiography gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography,for optimizing the scan protocols of coronary angiography CTA. Methods Sixty patients with heart rate between 70 and 90 beats/min were randomly divided into prospectively ECG-gated group(group A) and retrospectively ECG-gated group(group B), their image quality and radiation dose were compared.Results The percent of qualified image in group A and B was 93.7%(253/270)and 99.3%(268/270), respectively, with a significant difference( 0.05).Effective dose of group A and B was(4.020±0.463)mSv and(16.649±1.232)mSv, respectively, with a significant difference( 0.05).Conclusions Radiation dose in prospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography was lower than that of retrospectively one.But the image quality of prospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography was worse than that of retrospectively one in patients with high heart rate.
Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation dose, Coronary angiography, Heart rate, Nuclear medicine, Angiography, Electrocardiography, Image quality