2009•Clinical Medical EngineeringRequires access

Comparison between Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy in Clinical Application

Xuzhi Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of non-prolapsed uterus vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.Methods:Patients with non-prolapsed uterus in obstetric hospitalization in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2008 were observed by dividing into experimental group with 31 cases for vaginal hysterectomy and control group with 30 cases for conventional abdominal hysterectomy.A forward-looking re search was made in the aspects of operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative morbidity,postoperative anal exhaust time,and an average hospital stay in two groups.Results:The operative time,postoperative morbidity,anal exhaust time,postoperative hospitalization days in the vagi nal group were significantly less than those in the abdominal group,with significant difference(P 0.01),except for intraoperative bleeding(P 0.05) between the two groups.Conclusion:Non-prolapsed uterus vaginal hysterectomy is superior to abdominal hysterectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of non-prolapsed uterus vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.Methods:Patients with non-prolapsed uterus in obstetric hospitalization in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2008 were observed by dividing into experimental group with 31 cases for vaginal hysterectomy and control group with 30 cases for conventional abdominal hysterectomy.A forward-looking re search was made in the aspects of operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative morbidity,postoperative anal exhaust time,and an average hospital stay in two groups.Results:The operative time,postoperative morbidity,anal exhaust time,postoperative hospitalization days in the vagi nal group were significantly less than those in the abdominal group,with significant difference(P 0.01),except for intraoperative bleeding(P 0.05) between the two groups.Conclusion:Non-prolapsed uterus vaginal hysterectomy is superior to abdominal hysterectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of non-prolapsed uterus vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.Methods:Patients with non-prolapsed uterus in obstetric hospitalization in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2008 were observed by dividing into experimental group with 31 cases for vaginal hysterectomy and control group with 30 cases for conventional abdominal hysterectomy.A forward-looking re search was made in the aspects of operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative morbidity,postoperative anal exhaust time,and an average hospital stay in two groups.Results:The operative time,postoperative morbidity,anal exhaust time,postoperative hospitalization days in the vagi nal group were significantly less than those in the abdominal group,with significant difference(P 0.01),except for intraoperative bleeding(P 0.05) between the two groups.Conclusion:Non-prolapsed uterus vaginal hysterectomy is superior to abdominal hysterectomy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Abdominal hysterectomy, Hysterectomy, Uterus, Surgery, Abdominal wound, Internal medicine

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy in Clinical Application — Research Paper | ScholarLens