1999•Zhonghua xiaohua neijing zazhiRequires access

Evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a method of choice?

Wei Changzhen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) is a treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis remains debatable. This study was attempted to make an evaluation on the topic. Methods 207 patients treated by LC for gallbladder stone with acute inflammation were retrospectively reviewed with emphasis on incidence of postoperative complication, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy(OC) and factors influencing the conversion of approach. Results This series revealed that the rate of conversion to OC attained 32.3%; the incidence of complication reached 20.9% , significantly higher than that after conventional OC( 5.7% ). Pathology of the inflamed gallbladder ; time elapsed from onset ; length of present history ; severity of leucocytosis and even patient’s sex were taken into consideration as probable factors for the conversion . Conclusion In the case of acute cholecystitis adoption of LC should be scrutinized because LC is likely to be contraindicated in presence of the factors mentioned above.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) is a treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis remains debatable. This study was attempted to make an evaluation on the topic. Methods 207 patients treated by LC for gallbladder stone with acute inflammation were retrospectively reviewed with emphasis on incidence of postoperative complication, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy(OC) and factors influencing the conversion of approach. Results This series revealed that the rate of conversion to OC attained 32.3%; the incidence of complication reached 20.9% , significantly higher than that after conventional OC( 5.7% ). Pathology of the inflamed gallbladder ; time elapsed from onset ; length of present history ; severity of leucocytosis and even patient’s sex were taken into consideration as probable factors for the conversion . Conclusion In the case of acute cholecystitis adoption of LC should be scrutinized because LC is likely to be contraindicated in presence of the factors mentioned above.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) is a treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis remains debatable. This study was attempted to make an evaluation on the topic. Methods 207 patients treated by LC for gallbladder stone with acute inflammation were retrospectively reviewed with emphasis on incidence of postoperative complication, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy(OC) and factors influencing the conversion of approach. Results This series revealed that the rate of conversion to OC attained 32.3%; the incidence of complication reached 20.9% , significantly higher than that after conventional OC( 5.7% ). Pathology of the inflamed gallbladder ; time elapsed from onset ; length of present history ; severity of leucocytosis and even patient’s sex were taken into consideration as probable factors for the conversion . Conclusion In the case of acute cholecystitis adoption of LC should be scrutinized because LC is likely to be contraindicated in presence of the factors mentioned above.

Key concepts: Medicine, Acute cholecystitis, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Incidence (geometry), Cholecystectomy, Complication, Gallbladder, Cholecystitis

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a method of choice? — Research Paper | ScholarLens