Study on relative bioavailability and bioequiavailability assessment of Azithromycin tablets
Feng Wang
Abstract
Feng Wang
Abstract
Objective To study the relative bioavailability and bioequiavailability of Azithromycin tablets. Method A single oral dose of 20mg test Azithromycin tablets and reference Azithromycin tablets was given to 22 volunteers in a randomized cross-over study. Azithromycin concentrations in plasma were determined with LC/MS/MS method. Results Tmax of test Azithromycin tablets and reference Azithromycin tablets were (2.0±1.4)h and (1.8±0.6)h respectively, Cmax were (584.27±258.93)ng/ml and (523.27±186.53)ng/ml, T_ 1/2 were (47.64±10.38)h and (51.96±12.49)h, AUC_ 0→t were (3532.26±1311.69)ng·h/ml and (3500.10±1229.70)ng·h/ml, and AUC_ 0→∞ were (3986.30±1443.52)ng·h/ml and (4015.14±1426.56)ng·h/ml. Conclusion There is no statistically significant difference between the two preparations in AUC values and the results demonstrate that the two preparations are bioquivalent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To study the relative bioavailability and bioequiavailability of Azithromycin tablets. Method A single oral dose of 20mg test Azithromycin tablets and reference Azithromycin tablets was given to 22 volunteers in a randomized cross-over study. Azithromycin concentrations in plasma were determined with LC/MS/MS method. Results Tmax of test Azithromycin tablets and reference Azithromycin tablets were (2.0±1.4)h and (1.8±0.6)h respectively, Cmax were (584.27±258.93)ng/ml and (523.27±186.53)ng/ml, T_ 1/2 were (47.64±10.38)h and (51.96±12.49)h, AUC_ 0→t were (3532.26±1311.69)ng·h/ml and (3500.10±1229.70)ng·h/ml, and AUC_ 0→∞ were (3986.30±1443.52)ng·h/ml and (4015.14±1426.56)ng·h/ml. Conclusion There is no statistically significant difference between the two preparations in AUC values and the results demonstrate that the two preparations are bioquivalent.
Key concepts: Azithromycin, Medicine, Bioavailability, Cmax, Pharmacokinetics, Significant difference, Bioequivalence, Internal medicine