A Study on Evaluation Indicator System for Journals of Humanities and Social Science
Xinning Su
Abstract
Xinning Su
Abstract
This article is going to discuss the present research situation of the journal evaluation in China.It elaborates the indicators used in the journal evaluation and shows the fact that the journal evaluation indicator of the past is not adaptable to the evaluation for the current journals in humanities and social science.The author of the article puts forward some revised strategies for to evaluate the journals according to the characteristics of the citation index.The author also proposes an evaluation indicators system for journals of humanities and social science in China.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article is going to discuss the present research situation of the journal evaluation in China.It elaborates the indicators used in the journal evaluation and shows the fact that the journal evaluation indicator of the past is not adaptable to the evaluation for the current journals in humanities and social science.The author of the article puts forward some revised strategies for to evaluate the journals according to the characteristics of the citation index.The author also proposes an evaluation indicators system for journals of humanities and social science in China.
Key concepts: China, Digital humanities, Citation index, Citation, Index (typography), Sociology, Social science, Library science