2005Chinese Journal of Food HygieneRequires access

On reasonableness of administrative penalty discretion

HE Hai-yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Nation administrative organs or the lawauthorized organizations exercise managing authority over relative people of administration in accordance with the law, implement administrative penalty to citizens, legal persons or organizations who violate the aduninistrative laws and regulations,so as to maintain the order of market economy, set up the essential means for a legal society. Administrative penalty must go on in accordance with the law. Administrative penalty law of PRC still stipulates clearly: “Administrative penalty must be imposed in adherence to the principles of fairness and openness. The principle of legality of administrative penalty can be seen clearly and intelligibly in a lot of relevant law and regulations and various kinds of administrative or judicial interpretations. However, embodiment of fairness and justice while emphasizing legality, namely the rationality principle of discretion is a question difficult to achieve in theory especially in practice discretion is not free in judging. On the basis of analyzing the meaning, current situation (question) and reason of the right of discretion from nine aspects, the authors discussed the question of how to hold the administrative right of discretion properly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nation administrative organs or the lawauthorized organizations exercise managing authority over relative people of administration in accordance with the law, implement administrative penalty to citizens, legal persons or organizations who violate the aduninistrative laws and regulations,so as to maintain the order of market economy, set up the essential means for a legal society. Administrative penalty must go on in accordance with the law. Administrative penalty law of PRC still stipulates clearly: “Administrative penalty must be imposed in adherence to the principles of fairness and openness. The principle of legality of administrative penalty can be seen clearly and intelligibly in a lot of relevant law and regulations and various kinds of administrative or judicial interpretations. However, embodiment of fairness and justice while emphasizing legality, namely the rationality principle of discretion is a question difficult to achieve in theory especially in practice discretion is not free in judging. On the basis of analyzing the meaning, current situation (question) and reason of the right of discretion from nine aspects, the authors discussed the question of how to hold the administrative right of discretion properly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nation administrative organs or the lawauthorized organizations exercise managing authority over relative people of administration in accordance with the law, implement administrative penalty to citizens, legal persons or organizations who violate the aduninistrative laws and regulations,so as to maintain the order of market economy, set up the essential means for a legal society. Administrative penalty must go on in accordance with the law. Administrative penalty law of PRC still stipulates clearly: “Administrative penalty must be imposed in adherence to the principles of fairness and openness. The principle of legality of administrative penalty can be seen clearly and intelligibly in a lot of relevant law and regulations and various kinds of administrative or judicial interpretations. However, embodiment of fairness and justice while emphasizing legality, namely the rationality principle of discretion is a question difficult to achieve in theory especially in practice discretion is not free in judging. On the basis of analyzing the meaning, current situation (question) and reason of the right of discretion from nine aspects, the authors discussed the question of how to hold the administrative right of discretion properly.

Key concepts: Principle of legality, Discretion, Administrative law, Administrative discretion, Rationality, Law, Law and economics, Economic Justice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On reasonableness of administrative penalty discretion — Research Paper | ScholarLens