On the Positions of Character, Word and Morpheme in the Chinese Language
Jian Sun
Abstract
Jian Sun
Abstract
Zi (Character) is special level in the Chinese written language which was the focus of study in traditional Chinese linguistics in the past. However, the development of the Chinese language requires the introduction of another two concepts: word morpheme. Ancient Chinese is monosyllabic characterstandard language, which is basically the unity of character, word morpheme with only few exceptions. Modern Chinese, on the contrary, is a wordstandard language whose main structural unit is polysyllabic words in which characters, words morphemes are different from each other. The characterstandard theory, which is not fit for modern Chinese, is simply regression to ancient Chinese. The concepts of and character group in this theory are misleading, they are not consistent with the nice name standard stipulated by Xunzi. The best choice is to distinguish character, word morpheme from each other in terms of their functions. Our theory of the Chinese language should be consistent with the reality of the language modern linguistic theories.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Zi (Character) is special level in the Chinese written language which was the focus of study in traditional Chinese linguistics in the past. However, the development of the Chinese language requires the introduction of another two concepts: word morpheme. Ancient Chinese is monosyllabic characterstandard language, which is basically the unity of character, word morpheme with only few exceptions. Modern Chinese, on the contrary, is a wordstandard language whose main structural unit is polysyllabic words in which characters, words morphemes are different from each other. The characterstandard theory, which is not fit for modern Chinese, is simply regression to ancient Chinese. The concepts of and character group in this theory are misleading, they are not consistent with the nice name standard stipulated by Xunzi. The best choice is to distinguish character, word morpheme from each other in terms of their functions. Our theory of the Chinese language should be consistent with the reality of the language modern linguistic theories.
Key concepts: Morpheme, Character (mathematics), Linguistics, Word (group theory), Chinese language, Focus (optics), Computer science, Mathematics