2005Jiangxi Cai-Jing Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Constitution and Consequence of the Unjust Enrichment in Macau Civil Code

LI Li-na

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article is about the doctrine of the unjust enrichment. The name of the unjust enrichment in the old Roman law is “condictio”. The unjust enrichment means a benefit obtained from another, not intended as a present and not legally justifiable, for which the beneficiary should make recompense.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article is about the doctrine of the unjust enrichment. The name of the unjust enrichment in the old Roman law is “condictio”. The unjust enrichment means a benefit obtained from another, not intended as a present and not legally justifiable, for which the beneficiary should make recompense.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article is about the doctrine of the unjust enrichment. The name of the unjust enrichment in the old Roman law is “condictio”. The unjust enrichment means a benefit obtained from another, not intended as a present and not legally justifiable, for which the beneficiary should make recompense.

Key concepts: Unjust enrichment, Beneficiary, Doctrine, Constitution, Law, Civil code, Political science, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constitution and Consequence of the Unjust Enrichment in Macau Civil Code — Research Paper | ScholarLens