2004Zhonghua neifenmi daixie zazhiRequires access

Influence of pioglitazone or metformin on insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Weng Jian-pin, Jianping Weng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of pioglitazone or metformin on insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This 12-week study included 50 type 2 diabetic patients on a stable regime of asulfonylureaand/oracarbosefor≥4 weeks, and with a fasting plasma glucose 7.8-13.9 mmol/L, and/or postprandial blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L. All the patients were randomized into two groups. The subjects in pioglitazone group received pioglitazone 30 mg (2 tablets) once daily and placebo of metformin (imitated metformin) 1 tablet twice daily. The subjects in metformin group received metformin 500 mg (1 tablet) twice daily and placebo of pioglitazone (imitated pioglitazone) 2 tablet once daily. Each subject was followed for 12 weeks. Results After treatment with metformin, the fasting and postprandial serum C peptide and Homa-IR were decreased, and Homa-β was increased. Meanwhile, in pioglitazone group the same change occurred. Pioglitazone was better in decreasing postprandial insulin and improving IR as compared with metformin. There were no significant changes of free fat acid levels before and after treatment in two groups. Conclusion Both pioglitazone and metformin were effective in decreasing IR and increasing Homa-β. Pioglitazone was somewhat better than metformin in improving IR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effects of pioglitazone or metformin on insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This 12-week study included 50 type 2 diabetic patients on a stable regime of asulfonylureaand/oracarbosefor≥4 weeks, and with a fasting plasma glucose 7.8-13.9 mmol/L, and/or postprandial blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L. All the patients were randomized into two groups. The subjects in pioglitazone group received pioglitazone 30 mg (2 tablets) once daily and placebo of metformin (imitated metformin) 1 tablet twice daily. The subjects in metformin group received metformin 500 mg (1 tablet) twice daily and placebo of pioglitazone (imitated pioglitazone) 2 tablet once daily. Each subject was followed for 12 weeks. Results After treatment with metformin, the fasting and postprandial serum C peptide and Homa-IR were decreased, and Homa-β was increased. Meanwhile, in pioglitazone group the same change occurred. Pioglitazone was better in decreasing postprandial insulin and improving IR as compared with metformin. There were no significant changes of free fat acid levels before and after treatment in two groups. Conclusion Both pioglitazone and metformin were effective in decreasing IR and increasing Homa-β. Pioglitazone was somewhat better than metformin in improving IR.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effects of pioglitazone or metformin on insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This 12-week study included 50 type 2 diabetic patients on a stable regime of asulfonylureaand/oracarbosefor≥4 weeks, and with a fasting plasma glucose 7.8-13.9 mmol/L, and/or postprandial blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L. All the patients were randomized into two groups. The subjects in pioglitazone group received pioglitazone 30 mg (2 tablets) once daily and placebo of metformin (imitated metformin) 1 tablet twice daily. The subjects in metformin group received metformin 500 mg (1 tablet) twice daily and placebo of pioglitazone (imitated pioglitazone) 2 tablet once daily. Each subject was followed for 12 weeks. Results After treatment with metformin, the fasting and postprandial serum C peptide and Homa-IR were decreased, and Homa-β was increased. Meanwhile, in pioglitazone group the same change occurred. Pioglitazone was better in decreasing postprandial insulin and improving IR as compared with metformin. There were no significant changes of free fat acid levels before and after treatment in two groups. Conclusion Both pioglitazone and metformin were effective in decreasing IR and increasing Homa-β. Pioglitazone was somewhat better than metformin in improving IR.

Key concepts: Pioglitazone, Metformin, Postprandial, Internal medicine, Medicine, Endocrinology, Insulin resistance, Placebo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of pioglitazone or metformin on insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus — Research Paper | ScholarLens