2005•Practical Journal of Medicine & PharmacyRequires access

Clinical application of the suture hemostasis device Perclose after coronary interventional procedure for senile patients

Y Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the suture hemostasis device Perclose after coronary interventional procedure in the elderly. Methods The 204 elderly patients who underwent coronary interventional procedure were divided into two groups: 97 patients accepted Perclose device for hemostasis(the suture group); 107 patients accepted manual method for hemostasis(the control group). Times to successful hemostasis, times to crura ambulance, and complications associated with the proce-dure were recorded.Results The rates of successful hemostasis were 92.8% in the suture group and 93.5% in the control group( Times to successful hemostasis were (1.9 in the suture group and (27.5 in the control group(t=17.3,P0.01); times to ambulation were (4.0 vs (22.0 in the suture and control groups respectively(t=29.3,P0.01). The occurence rates of complication were 3.1% vs 18.7% in the suture group and control group respectively( Conclusion Perclose suture device is safe and effective for hemostasis of the femoral access site after coronary interventional procedure in elderly patients. The benefit compared with the control group was as following: (1)Times to successful hemostasis and to crura ambulation were shorter than the control group. The patients′discomfort from the crura motionless were decreased.(2)The occurence rate of complication was decreased significantly. The disadvantage is too expensive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the suture hemostasis device Perclose after coronary interventional procedure in the elderly. Methods The 204 elderly patients who underwent coronary interventional procedure were divided into two groups: 97 patients accepted Perclose device for hemostasis(the suture group); 107 patients accepted manual method for hemostasis(the control group). Times to successful hemostasis, times to crura ambulance, and complications associated with the proce-dure were recorded.Results The rates of successful hemostasis were 92.8% in the suture group and 93.5% in the control group( Times to successful hemostasis were (1.9 in the suture group and (27.5 in the control group(t=17.3,P0.01); times to ambulation were (4.0 vs (22.0 in the suture and control groups respectively(t=29.3,P0.01). The occurence rates of complication were 3.1% vs 18.7% in the suture group and control group respectively( Conclusion Perclose suture device is safe and effective for hemostasis of the femoral access site after coronary interventional procedure in elderly patients. The benefit compared with the control group was as following: (1)Times to successful hemostasis and to crura ambulation were shorter than the control group. The patients′discomfort from the crura motionless were decreased.(2)The occurence rate of complication was decreased significantly. The disadvantage is too expensive.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the suture hemostasis device Perclose after coronary interventional procedure in the elderly. Methods The 204 elderly patients who underwent coronary interventional procedure were divided into two groups: 97 patients accepted Perclose device for hemostasis(the suture group); 107 patients accepted manual method for hemostasis(the control group). Times to successful hemostasis, times to crura ambulance, and complications associated with the proce-dure were recorded.Results The rates of successful hemostasis were 92.8% in the suture group and 93.5% in the control group( Times to successful hemostasis were (1.9 in the suture group and (27.5 in the control group(t=17.3,P0.01); times to ambulation were (4.0 vs (22.0 in the suture and control groups respectively(t=29.3,P0.01). The occurence rates of complication were 3.1% vs 18.7% in the suture group and control group respectively( Conclusion Perclose suture device is safe and effective for hemostasis of the femoral access site after coronary interventional procedure in elderly patients. The benefit compared with the control group was as following: (1)Times to successful hemostasis and to crura ambulation were shorter than the control group. The patients′discomfort from the crura motionless were decreased.(2)The occurence rate of complication was decreased significantly. The disadvantage is too expensive.

Key concepts: Hemostasis, Medicine, Fibrous joint, Surgery, Complication, Anesthesia

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical application of the suture hemostasis device Perclose after coronary interventional procedure for senile patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens