Target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with remifentanil or fentanyl: a comparison of anesthetic depth
Zhongjun Zhang, Yang Liqun, Yumei Peng, Fang Ming, Rong Li, Quan Li, YU Wei-feng
Abstract
Zhongjun Zhang, Yang Liqun, Yumei Peng, Fang Ming, Rong Li, Quan Li, YU Wei-feng
Abstract
Objective:To compare the anesthetic depth and postoperative recovery of propofol combined with remifentanil or fentanyl when administered through target-controlled infusion(TCI).Methods: Ninety patients receiving elective epigastric surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups: PF-A,PF-B and PR group.Through TCI,patients in PF-A group were administered with propofol(3 μg /ml) and fentanyl(2 μg/L),in PF-B group with propofol(3 μg/ml) and fentanyl(4 μg/L initially and 2 μg/L after intubation),and in PR group with propofol(3 μg/ml) and remifentanil(6 μg/L).Vital signs(including mean aortic pressure and heart rate) and bispectral index values were recorded pre-anesthesia,pre-and post-intubation,post-incision and during operation in 3 groups.Results: In PF-A group,post-intubation MAP and HR were significantly higher than those of pre-intubation(P0.05),with obvious stress response during intubation.Whereas there was no significant difference in all parameters between those pre-intubation and post-incision.The vital signs maintained stable during anesthesia and operation in PF-B and PR groups.There was no significant difference in BIS values between 3 groups.During recovery phase the awakening time of PR group was significantly shorter than those of PF-A and PF-B groups.Conclusion: Clinical administration of 4 μg/L fentanyl or 6 μg/L remifentanil can effectively suppress the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and incision in propofol TCI anesthesia.However,2 μg/L fentanyl is only enough to suppress the response to incision but not to intubation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare the anesthetic depth and postoperative recovery of propofol combined with remifentanil or fentanyl when administered through target-controlled infusion(TCI).Methods: Ninety patients receiving elective epigastric surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups: PF-A,PF-B and PR group.Through TCI,patients in PF-A group were administered with propofol(3 μg /ml) and fentanyl(2 μg/L),in PF-B group with propofol(3 μg/ml) and fentanyl(4 μg/L initially and 2 μg/L after intubation),and in PR group with propofol(3 μg/ml) and remifentanil(6 μg/L).Vital signs(including mean aortic pressure and heart rate) and bispectral index values were recorded pre-anesthesia,pre-and post-intubation,post-incision and during operation in 3 groups.Results: In PF-A group,post-intubation MAP and HR were significantly higher than those of pre-intubation(P0.05),with obvious stress response during intubation.Whereas there was no significant difference in all parameters between those pre-intubation and post-incision.The vital signs maintained stable during anesthesia and operation in PF-B and PR groups.There was no significant difference in BIS values between 3 groups.During recovery phase the awakening time of PR group was significantly shorter than those of PF-A and PF-B groups.Conclusion: Clinical administration of 4 μg/L fentanyl or 6 μg/L remifentanil can effectively suppress the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and incision in propofol TCI anesthesia.However,2 μg/L fentanyl is only enough to suppress the response to incision but not to intubation.
Key concepts: Fentanyl, Propofol, Remifentanil, Anesthesia, Medicine, Intubation, Anesthetic, Bispectral index