2002Journal of Teachers College of Shanxi UniversityRequires access

Preliminary Discussion on Mutual Compensation and Coexistence of Revivification and Integer Theories

Dong Li-he

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

From the seventeenth century to the late twentieth century, there emerged a modern science paradigm, which was based on the doctrines established by such scientists as Galileo, Bacon, Descartes and Newton, with mechanism, determinism and reductionism as its characteristics. The modern science paradigm had so obvious limitations that it was criticized and questioned by many scientists and philosophers in the twentieth century. In the meantime, a postmodern science paradigm, based on organism, indeterminacy, chaos, complexity and entropy, began to take form. Modern science and postmodern science respectively embody two different modes of thinking, that is, reductionism and holism. Since the two modes of thinking have their own insuperable limitations, a tension should be kept between them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From the seventeenth century to the late twentieth century, there emerged a modern science paradigm, which was based on the doctrines established by such scientists as Galileo, Bacon, Descartes and Newton, with mechanism, determinism and reductionism as its characteristics. The modern science paradigm had so obvious limitations that it was criticized and questioned by many scientists and philosophers in the twentieth century. In the meantime, a postmodern science paradigm, based on organism, indeterminacy, chaos, complexity and entropy, began to take form. Modern science and postmodern science respectively embody two different modes of thinking, that is, reductionism and holism. Since the two modes of thinking have their own insuperable limitations, a tension should be kept between them.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From the seventeenth century to the late twentieth century, there emerged a modern science paradigm, which was based on the doctrines established by such scientists as Galileo, Bacon, Descartes and Newton, with mechanism, determinism and reductionism as its characteristics. The modern science paradigm had so obvious limitations that it was criticized and questioned by many scientists and philosophers in the twentieth century. In the meantime, a postmodern science paradigm, based on organism, indeterminacy, chaos, complexity and entropy, began to take form. Modern science and postmodern science respectively embody two different modes of thinking, that is, reductionism and holism. Since the two modes of thinking have their own insuperable limitations, a tension should be kept between them.

Key concepts: Reductionism, Holism, Determinism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Postmodernism, Indeterminacy (philosophy), Philosophy of science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preliminary Discussion on Mutual Compensation and Coexistence of Revivification and Integer Theories — Research Paper | ScholarLens