2009•Journal of Hebei UniversityRequires access

Two Misunderstandings in the Studies on the Burden of Proof Shouldered by the Criminal Defendant——Focus on the Type and Degree of Burden of Proof

Kang Huai-yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The defendant in criminal procedure exceptionally shoulders the burden of on some facts. In the academic studies of this subject,there are two relatively common misunderstandings. The first involves the type of burden of born by the defendant. It is considered that the defendant only has the burden of production but not the burden of persuasion. The second involves the degree of the defendant's burden. It is said that when the defendant fulfills the burden of production,the standard of proof can be preponderance of the evidence. If we say that the first misunderstanding is only a mistaken knowledge about the situation abroad,the second will lead to virtually wrong conclusion that conflicts with the principle of presumption of innocence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The defendant in criminal procedure exceptionally shoulders the burden of on some facts. In the academic studies of this subject,there are two relatively common misunderstandings. The first involves the type of burden of born by the defendant. It is considered that the defendant only has the burden of production but not the burden of persuasion. The second involves the degree of the defendant's burden. It is said that when the defendant fulfills the burden of production,the standard of proof can be preponderance of the evidence. If we say that the first misunderstanding is only a mistaken knowledge about the situation abroad,the second will lead to virtually wrong conclusion that conflicts with the principle of presumption of innocence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The defendant in criminal procedure exceptionally shoulders the burden of on some facts. In the academic studies of this subject,there are two relatively common misunderstandings. The first involves the type of burden of born by the defendant. It is considered that the defendant only has the burden of production but not the burden of persuasion. The second involves the degree of the defendant's burden. It is said that when the defendant fulfills the burden of production,the standard of proof can be preponderance of the evidence. If we say that the first misunderstanding is only a mistaken knowledge about the situation abroad,the second will lead to virtually wrong conclusion that conflicts with the principle of presumption of innocence.

Key concepts: Burden of proof, Presumption, Presumption of innocence, Subject (documents), Psychology, Degree (music), Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two Misunderstandings in the Studies on the Burden of Proof Shouldered by the Criminal Defendant——Focus on the Type and Degree of Burden of Proof — Research Paper | ScholarLens